Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Lucy: Luc Besson's latest inventive action effort

Today, I look at the new sci-fi thriller starring Scarlett Johansson.

Lucy:
In Taiwan, Lucy, a foreign exchange student, is living with her friends and new boyfriend Richard. Richard convinces her to deliver a briefcase to some clients for him, and succeeds in convincing her. Unfortunately, the deal goes sour: they are betrayed, Richard is killed, and Lucy is kidnapped by Korean gangster led by the intimidating Mr. Jang. Jang has her knocked out and has the contents of the briefcase (a bag of purple/blue powder) surgically put inside her, making her an unwilling drug mule. The bag breaks inside her, spreading this new drug throughout her blood stream, allowing her to access more than 10% of her brain, which leads her to get amazing powers, and she pursues revenge while also finding a way to cure herself of this affliction.
   Scarlett Johansson uses her charm and experience as Black Widow in Marvel movies to pull off the role of the bad-ass and stone-cold Lucy. The movie relies a lot on her, and she pulls off the role well. Morgan Freeman, while a great actor, is just sort of there for more star power in this movie. Choi Min-Sik is a threatening, if slightly over-the-top bad guy as Jang. Amr Waked (Syriana, Contagion, Salmon Fishing in the Yemen) has a supporting role as bad-ass cop Del Rio, who allies with Lucy to take out Jang. Pilou Asbaek, Mason Lee (Ang Lee's son), Analeigh Tipton, and Frederic Chou fill out the rest of the cast, and all do fairly well in their small roles.
  The movie is a little too short, but it has a unique style (the opening sequence uses symbolic shots of animals) and some cool themes (such as the continuing motif of human evolution, even the name Lucy is related to evolution, but I won't give away how). Although it's a bit silly towards the end, and a lot of the characters are under-developed, I think it's a fun action movie and shows Besson still has some cool ideas. This movie has a different feel to it than his previous efforts (like Leon: The Professional or The Fifth Element), which makes it slightly refreshing.
  The film also has a cool synthesizer score by Eric Serra, and an original song ("Sister Rust") over the credits by Damon Albarn of Blur and Gorillaz fame.
   My main complaint is that the movie's ending is rushed and sloppy, and is under-explained, as if Besson couldn't figure out how to properly end it and decided just to sort of leave it open-ended, which results in a feeling of disappointment.
   Lucy may be a bit laughable at times, and be slightly under-developed, but Johansson's lead role, the unique premise, and cool soundtrack make it worth watching at least once, even if you wait for the DVD. 3/5 stars.

Lucy (2014 film) poster.jpg (Image: Wikipedia)

Saturday, July 26, 2014

Top 50 Movies of All Time: Volume 4

Today, I'll be revisiting my list of my top fifty favorite movies. For this installment, I'll count down from 20 to 11.

Criteria:
Personal opinion
No TV movies or miniseries
I am able to collect an entire series or trilogy into a single spot

20. Donnie Darko: Richard Kelly's dark and complicated science-fiction/horror drama boasts an impressive all-star cast and focuses on the exploits of a very troubled high-schooler by the name of Donnie Darko, who must deal with his psychological issues, hallucinations of a doomsday-prophesizing man in a uniquely terrifying bunny costume, his dysfunctional family, his morally bankrupt suburban community, and the possibility that time travel may exist. Jake Gyllenhaal is one of the younger actors in this movie and also delivers it's most nuanced and challenging performance, foreshadowing his career of consistently excellent performances. His real-life sister Maggie Gyllenhaal portrays his bitchy and whiny sister in this film, and the rest of the cast includes the film's executive producer Drew Barrymore, Patrick Swayze, Jena Malone, Daveigh Chase (Big Love, Lilo & Stitch, Spirited Away, The Ring), James Duval, musician Alex Greenwald, and a young Seth Rogen and Ashley Tisdale. All those big names for a low-budget movie that performed poorly at the box office and developed a cult following. However, the film was positively reviewed, which has since contributed to it's growing fan base. I remember the first time I saw this film, and I was pleasantly surprised by it's weird atmosphere and quirky characters, as well as it's brilliant writing and haunting soundtrack, featuring an ominous main theme by Michael Andrews and Gary Jules' depressing but memorable "Mad World".  It gets better with more viewings, and I have yet to view the praised director's cut, but I intend too as soon as possible. Donnie Darko isn't for everyone, but even if you don't like it, you have to give it credit for it's original plot and interesting characters, in addition to it's unique blend of genres (sci-fi, fantasy, horror, drama, high school movie, dark comedy, etc.) and haunting & ominous tone and atmosphere.

A collage of faces, in the shape of a head with rabbit ears.

19. Happiness: Todd Solondz's extremely dark and uncomfortable black comedy/satire is something that most people will probably find hard to stomach. A compelling and startlingly original and sometimes pessimistic view of life, the film tracks the lives of three sisters and their family and friends. One sister is unwittingly married to a pedophile who fruitlessly tries to control his horrible urges; another has an incredibly hard time trying to find the right man; and the third lives a few doors down from a perverted man who can only masturbate when making crass and obscene prank calls to women. Their parents are starting to drift apart in their old age after 40 years of marriage, and the son of the first sister and the pederast is confused and intrigued by his pubescent sexual urges. With a plot like that, it's easy to see why many find this one a little too off-beat and weird for their tastes. However, I found it to be an extremely enjoyable film, despite all it's horrible plot lines and pretty depressing and bleak ending that betrays it's title. It's got a cool visual style, and all the characters are richly written, despite them not exactly being "realistic". When I say that, I mean that this film exists in a sort of alternate, hyper-reality where everyone is just a little strange or "off" compared to people you'd meet on a day-to-day basis; and the fact that the family is this dysfunctional and has this many issues makes me wonder how they kept it together up until this point. The film's cast is also incredible: Jane Adams, Dylan Baker, Elizabeth Ashley, Lara Flynn Boyle, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Jared Harris, and Jon Lovitz are all fairly big names, and all do really great jobs, especially Baker, Hoffman, and Lovitz. Baker's performance is incredibly creepy and unsettling, even for a black comedy/drama, and also a little pathetic. I almost felt pity for him for how fucked up his life has become, but that pity reached it's limits when he (Spoiler) tearfully admits to his son that he wouldn't molest him, but "jerk off instead". That was my breaking point with this character, he crossed the point of no return as far as unsympathetic goes. Hoffman is also very weird, but not in that way, he's just kind of an odd, soft-spoken pervert. Hoffman is able to convey a lot without saying a lot, and comes off as the most awkward, pathetic guy on earth, but is also able to find a strange sort of happiness near the end, which is quickly crushes by a startling revelation. Anyway, Happiness is definitely not the type of movie you want to watch if you're in the mood for an uplifting or lighthearted film, but if you like bleak and kind of quirky black comedies, or are a fan of Todd Solondz, than this movie is definitely for you, I know I loved it.

Happiness1998Poster.jpg

18. E.T., The Extra Terrestrial and Jurassic Park (tie): Both are Steven Spielberg films, and each is considered a classic in it's own right.
The first is unbelievably sappy and cheesy when you think about it, but I really can't help but like it because it's one of those movies that's timeless and will always hold a special spot in my heart. The special effects are extremely good for the early 80's and the relationship between Elliot and the alien is actually pretty touching. The main theme is also extremely memorable and iconic, as is the shot of E.T. and Elliot flying on a bike past the full moon.
The second is the darker and more violent but still successful and beloved Jurassic Park, based on Michael Crichton's bestseller. The CGI and animatronics are still awe-inspiring today, as shown by the ticket sales on the 3D re-release. John Williams' amazing musical score is iconic and induces extreme nostalgia. The action is exciting and the dinosaurs can actually be terrifyingly realistic (especially those velociraptors, who are regarded as some of the scariest creatures in any movie). And also: it's dinosaurs. It's fucking dinosaurs. And who is fascinated or at least intrigued by those? Both these movies deliver timeless stories, and have a visionary and experienced director behind them to bring those stories to life convincingly.


E t the extra terrestrial ver3.jpg     A black poster featuring a red shield with a stylized Tyrannosaurus skeleton under a plaque reading "Jurassic Park". Below is the tagline "An Adventure 65 Million Years In the Making".

17. American Psycho: Mary Harron's scary and polished psychological thriller/horror film/black comedy is a fascinating character piece on one Patrick Bateman (Christian Bale, who delivers what is arguably his best performance in any movie), a Wall Street banker who has everything: equally shallow, pretentious, and narcissistic friends and coworkers; an extravagant lifestyle; more money than he can spend; and all the cocaine he can snort and hard alcohol he can consume. But what he really loves more than anything in the world: killing random people, or those who are more wealthy and tasteful than he is. This movie, like Trainspotting before it, starts off as an extremely black comedy, but slowly progresses to a point where it's more of a straightforward psychological drama. Bale tackles an incredibly challenging character: Bateman constantly switches from over-the-top and goofy, to suave and sophisticated, to openly narcissistic and self-absorbed, to whimpering idiot, to terrifying serial killer. Every scene he's in is tense, as anything sets him off: from something as hurtful as someone unknowingly insulting him to his face, to something as trivial and vain as someone having a slightly better business card than him. The rest of the cast are excellent as well, the lineup consisting of Willem Dafoe, Jared Leto, Josh Lucas, Chloe Sevigny, Cara Seymour, Reese Witherspoon, Justin Theroux, Guinevere Turner, Matt Ross, and others. Mary Harron's direction and writing (the latter with Guinevere Turner) is excellent for a relatively unknown director and screenwriter (she is seriously underrated), and the cinematography is gorgeous. I've never read Bret Easton Ellis' satirical novel, but I plan to, and I've heard that the film tops the book in some ways, and captures the tone perfectly. The mind-bending and bleak ending is fantastic, and Bateman's ending monologue is expertly written by Harron and Turner and convincingly delivered by Bale. The ending is brilliant, bold, and risky, as it could have left audience members disappointed and confused. Luckily, most people got it: it's supposed to leave the audience as conflicted and confused about Bateman as he is about himself, and shows how the world Bateman inhabits is so shallow and vapid that he will continually evade justice even if he confesses his countless crimes directly to a lawyer (who mistakes his confession for a joke, and doesn't even recognize Bateman). The ending is also terrifyingly unclear: is Bateman a ruthless serial killer who will constantly get away with it, or is he a schizophrenic who has imagined these crimes with such vivid detail that he has begun to believe his own fantasies have come to pass? Either way you look at it, it's creepy and leaves you in a state of uncertainty, which I think unsettles many people, as we as a species always want to find the answers to things that are unknown, or find a motive behind a crime, and the fact that the crimes we have seen may never be resolved (and may have not even happened) scares people. That's what makes this film a real horror story despite all the black humor, and it's also this complexity and richness that makes me love this movie the more I watch it.

Americanpsychoposter.jpg

16. The Departed: Martin Scorsese's complicated and violent thriller is a remake of the equally entertaining Hong Kong crime film Infernal Affairs. It follows the stories of two moles: the first, Billy Costigan, is a young man from an infamous criminal family in Boston. Unbeknownst to his friends, Costigan is an off-the-record informant for the police department, embedded deep inside ruthless Irish mafia boss Frank Costello's criminal empire. The second is Colin Sullivan, a staff sergeant in the Massachusetts State Police. He's clean-cut, friendly, and trustworthy. Little do any of his coworkers know, he is a mole for Costello's organization, and has been trained for his occupation since he was a kid. Everything is going smoothly for the first few months, but as time goes on, the inevitable crossing of paths occurs, and as things get more tense and both moles' lives begin to unravel, they begin to question their loyalties and try to survive and hide their true identities from their respective bosses. The film is obviously different than the original Hong Kong version, but from what I've heard it's actually one of the better Americanizations of an Asian film. The film has an amazing cast, featuring Matt Damon and Leonardo DiCaprio, who both give two of their best performances. DiCaprio is the more sympathetic of the two as Costigan, and he pulls off the leading man roles really well. Damon may also be a leading man, but as The Talented Mr. Ripley showcased, he can play a great villain, so his cutthroat portrayal of Sullivan is surprising and refreshing. Jack Nicholson is fantastic as Frank Costello, who is basically just a more sinister version of Nicholson. As much as I love and admire Nicholson, I will admit many of his performances are just different shades of Jack Nicholson. Here is no different, but that doesn't make it a bad performance. In fact, this character is strong because he is just as charismatic and weird as Nicholson himself is. Martin Sheen plays his opposite: the police captain Queenan. Where Costello is corrupt, Queenan is an upstanding citizen; where Costello is a cold-blooded killer, Queenan is very peaceful; where Costello is psychotic and unstable, Queenan is calm and collected; where Costello mocks religion, Queenan is a Catholic; and has a strong moral code; and where Costello scoffs at any sense of morality or remorse, Queenan is kind and has a strong moral code. Both these men represent one of the film's core themes: the archetypal Irish father figure. Costello is the yin to Queenan's yang, and they both show the two opposite sides of what the stereotypical Irish father figure can be: a caring and morally sound Irish police officer, or a violent and unpredictable Irish criminal. This is also similar to how Sullivan and Costigan, despite both being close to Costello and growing up in the same environment, couldn't be more different. This whole movie is full of overlapping themes like that, making it more than just another Scorsese crime movie. It's a modern masterpiece.

Departed234.jpg

15. The Shining and 2001: A Space Odyssey (tie): Both of these films are masterpieces, and are made by a man who is universally hailed as one of the best film directors, if not the best film director, of all time: Stanely Kubrick. The former is an adaptation of Stephen King's wildly popular novel The Shining. Kubrick took the already eerie source material and made it his own, improving upon it and making the ending bleaker and more open to interpretation, something that irritates King to this day. That's right: King hated the adaptation and even had a TV miniseries made in the mid-90's to show the version he wanted, and it was even titled Stephen King's The Shining. I, like most people, enjoy Kubrick's version better for it's revoltionary cinematography, haunting atmosphere and visuals, excellent score by Walter/Wendy Carlos, iconic performance by Jack Nicholson, and cerebral tone.
The latter is Kubrick's earlier effort: an epic about space, time, and man's evolution, and how they are all tied to a seemingly malevolent and enigmatic alien being, which is in the form of a mysterious black monolith. The soundtrack, beautiful and lush cinematography, iconic moments, terrifyingly cold and calculating computer/villain HAL 9000 (considered one of the great movie villains), and trippy and mind-bending ending are why I love this movie. They make it worth revisiting again and again and also make the viewer think. This is a great example of both arthouse cinema and science fiction movie, and is a great film to analyze, because a lot of it is open to interpretation: a staple of Kubrick's films.
Both these movies exemplify why Kubrick is such a master of the craft: he's a genius with the camera, and he knows exactly how to direct his actors and crew.

The Shining poster.jpgA painted image of four space-suited astronauts standing next to a piece of equipment atop a Lunar hill, in the distance is a Lunar base and a ball-shaped spacecraft descending toward it—with the earth hanging in a black sky in the background. Above the image appears "An epic drama of adventure and exploration" in blue block letters against a white background. Below the image in a black band, the title "2001: a space odyssey" appears in yellow block letters.

14. Lawrence of Arabia: David Lean's masterful and timeless epic tells the story of T.E. Lawrence, one of the most controversial and psychologically interesting figures in modern history. The cinematography is so beautiful and sweeping, and many of the shots were done without the aid of special effects, and since have not been able to be replicated. Peter O'Toole steals the show in one of his first major film roles. His performance as Lawrence is brilliant and complex, and it also leaves a lot open to interpretation, making it worth several re-watches. Sam Spiegel financed the film, and spared no expense. The budget and cast are both incredibly big, and the action highlight is the spectacular and expensive sequence involving the locomotive crash and raid. Alec Guinness, Anthoyn Quinn, Omar Sharif, and Jack Hawkins all give exceptional supporting performances. Sharif, in particular, stands out as the strongest supporting actor, and at the time was relatively unknown. Maurice Jarre's rousing and iconic musical score is also worth noting, as it has become one of the most recognizable and beloved movie themes of all time. Although the run-time can intimidate many and definitely strain some attentions spans, it's well worth it. It's just one of those movies that will always be considered a masterpiece.

Lawrence-of-arabia-2.jpg

13. Monty Python and the Holy Grail: A classic spoof film that pokes fun at medieval movies, culture, and people in general, it's sad to see that people these days are so used to films like A Haunted House and others like it that movies like this, that are absurd but also somehow subtle, go over their heads and they deem them "bad" or "stupid". I know that in my high school history class a while back my classmates did not understand the humor and simply brushed it off as being dumb or unintelligent, which couldn't be farther from the truth. I've now started to leave it out of my list when people ask me what my favorite films are because people (usually) give me funny looks when I say it's one of my favorite comedies. Anyway, the reasons I like it is because it's very quotable, the situations the characters face are purposely odd and confusing, the writing is extremely original, the acting (almost all the characters are portrayed by members of the Python comedy troupe) isn't exactly great (the actors often chew scenery), but that's actually done on purpose, the animated scenes are iconic and unique, and it's a movie you can still laugh at even if you've seen it a hundred times, because it's so offbeat and unlike anything else that you can't really help but like it.

Monty python and the holy grail 2001 release movie poster.jpg

12. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory: A timeless movie based on the equally excellent Roald Dahl book, I was surprised to hear that back when it was released, despite positive reception, it did horribly at the box office, but has since become beloved due to home video sales and television airings. Dahl hated the movies (similar to how Stephen King would disown The Shining ten years later), and the few awards it was nominated for it lost to Fiddler on the Roof. However, like I said before, it eventually grew on people..a lot, myself included. It's charming, despite all it's 70's strangeness (that psychedelic, bad trip tunnel sequence is infamous for giving kids nightmares), particularly due to Gene Wilder's perfect portrayal of Willy Wonka, appearing eccentric and odd but also somehow wise and kind. Peter Ostrum, in his only movie role, also does a fair job as Charlie. Jack Albertson is great as Charlie's grandpa Joe. This movie may not be for everyone, but it's still leagues above that shit Tim Burton reboot from 2005.

WillyWonkaMoviePoster.jpg

11. No Country for Old Men: The Coen Brothers' adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's dark and brooding modern western novel takes place in 1980 and follows an average joe and Vietnam vet named Llewelyn Moss, who comes across a drug deal gone wrong in the middle of nowhere. Pretty much everyone is dead, and the drug money is still left over. He decides to take the money, as he and his wife are struggling financially, but this proves to be a terrible decision: he finds himself being tracked down by a local sheriff who's on the brink of retirement, and (even worse) being hunted by Anton Chigurh, an emotionless, extremely skilled hitman who was hired to recover the money. This movie is a dark and thrilling cautionary tale: never get involved in a situation which can lead you to be in over your head. Javier Bardem's chilling and monotone performance as Chigurh earned him an Oscar, BAFTA, and a Golden Globe, among others. This is the role that introduced him to the American moviegoing public, and what an intro it is. Tommy Lee Jones, Josh Brolin, Woody Harrelson, and Kelly Macdonald also go fantastic in this movie. But I think what really makes it is the Coens' superb directing style and darkly comic writing, even though there's not too much comedy in this film. I really enjoy re-watching this movie for the cinematography, acting (particularly from Bardem), writing, and thrilling plot.

No Country for Old Men poster.jpg (Images: Wikipedia)

Runner-ups: Rocky, Ghostbusters, Back to the Future, Spaceballs, Psycho, Saving Private Ryan, Full Metal Jacket, Platoon, Gladiator, Braveheart, Forrest Gump, King Kong, Gojira, Traffic, Goldfinger, Casino Royale, Skyfall, The Borune Supremacy, The Town, Inception, Planet of the Apes, The Trasnformers: The Movie (1986), Alien, Predator, The Terminator, Robocop, Schindler's List, X-Men, Animal House, Seven, Team America, The Exorcist, The King's Speech, Blue Velvet, Mulholland Drive, Iron Man, The Avengers, The Omen, Rosemary's Baby, Amadeus, Gangs of New York, The Breakfast Club, Scarface, Oldboy, A Nightmare on Elm Street, First Blood, The Boondock Saints.

Friday, July 25, 2014

How to Train Your Dragon Films: Proof that DreamWorks Can Out-Do Disney

Today, I'm giving a long-belated review of DreamWorks' acclaimed Dragon film series, which just released it;s second installment.

How to Train Your Dragon:
This is a film I regret not seeing in theaters. It follows the exploits of a young man named Hiccup, who lives in the ancient Viking island village of Berk. He is weak and awkward, constantly disappointing his warrior father Stoick the Vast, who is the village's chief. He is also the laughingstock of the village, and no one believes him. The village must constantly fight off and/or capture hordes of seemingly malevolent dragons. One that keeps escaping them is the infamous Nightfury, a super-fast and stealthy dragon known for his unique purple fire breath. One night, Hiccup is able to (miraculously) shoot it down and it lands somewhere in the village's surrounding forest area. No one believes a fuck-up like Hiccup could manage to take down the most dangerous dragon in the land, so they think he's just trying to get attention. To prove them wrong, Hiccup goes to the forest to find that the Nightfury, who he dubs Toothless, is badly injured and afraid, and forms a bond with the dragon, secretly training it so he can fly it and they become inseparable. Unfortunately, if word gets out about Hiccup training a dragon, his father will be humiliated, Hiccup mocked and ridiculed, and the dragon most likely killed. Hiccup must choose between helping his new companion or impressing his father and village.
    This movie was genuinely surprising, considering at the time, Dream Works wasn't really doing that well at the time. Sure, they had some good films with Shrek, The Prince of Egypt, Spirit, Madagascar, Shrek 2, and even Shrek Forever After, but with films like Shark Tale and Shrek the Third under their belt, their reputation was getting tarnished. This is the film that re-cemented their place as a respectable animation studio, a real rival for Pixar, and made people interested in seeing their films again. The filmmaking duo behind the film, Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders, are no strangers to critical acclaim. They are most famous for directing Disney's Lilo & Stitch back in 2002, so they were experienced in how to make an enjoyable animated movie. It, like Shrek, is based off a cool, underrated kid's book, this time a British series by Cressida Cowell.
     The voice acting, featuring the talents of Jay Baruchel (whose unique voice and mannerisms in turn make Hiccup a memorable and unique animated character), Gerard Butler, America Ferrera, Craig Ferguson, Jonah Hill, T.J. Miller, Kristen Wiig, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, and David Tennant (who previously did audio book narrations of the book series), is excellent. Video game mo-capper and voice actor Robin Atkin-Downes (famous for his work with Naughty Dog on Uncharted and The Last of Us) voices a background character named Ack. All the actors' voices fit their characters perfectly, and you can tell the filmmakers and writers really cared about who was being cast, not just casting people because they're famous, but because their voice and mannerisms fit the character.
    The animation is fluent and beautiful, and the all the character and environment designs are original and memorable. The filmmakers even consulted cinematographer Roger Deakins to help with lighting, to give the film a "live-action feel" (USA Today, November 2009). The movie has a lot of unique dragon designs, and the action sequences are pretty exciting for a family film.
    Overall, How to Train Your Dragon may not be perfect, but it's an enjoyable underdog story with enough action and humor to keep everyone happy. I really hate the term "fun for the whole family", I find it to be overused and to just sound dumb, but I guess that's the best way to describe this movie. I'd say give it a watch or two. It won't disappoint. 4/5 stars.

How to Train Your Dragon Poster.jpg

How to Train Your Dragon 2:
I knew I had to catch this movie in theaters, considering I regretted missing #1 when it was still in theaters. In this film, Hiccup has turned from village outcast to it's most beloved citizen. His father Stoick, proud of his achievements as a warrior, and as teacher to everyone in the village, is considering putting him in the position of village chief, now that he is 20. Everything is going well for Hiccup, until, while flying with Toothless through unexplored lands, encounters dragon catchers, who work for a mysterious and ruthless figure named Drago Bludvist, who once attacked the Berk villagers, killing all the warriors but Stoick. Hiccup believes he can reason with him, and, against his father's warnings, tries to find Drago. He encounters another dragon trainer who he believes can help him on his quest, but also finds out the hard way that Drago may be too much for him to handle.
   This movie has a slightly darker tone than the previous installment, as most middle parts in a trilogy do (take Empire Strikes Back, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and The Dark Knight as great examples). Oh yeah, there's already a planned third and final installment. The action is more intense, the characters grow even more, and there's a more threatening villain. Yeah, last time there was terrifying massive dragon, but this time, there's an actual human threat, who can control dragons that are even bigger.
     Speaking of characters, the voice acting is still impressive, and the character and dragon designs are creative and memorable. Jay Baruchel, Gerard Butler, America Ferrera, Craig Ferguson, Jonah Hill, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Kristen Wiig and T.J. Miller all return from the previous film. New additions include Djimon Hounsou (Gladiator, In America, Amistad, Blood Diamond) who voices the villain Drago, and Kit Harington (Jon Snow from Game of Thrones, Pompeii), who voices anti-hero Eret. I was glad to see these two, underrated actors get work in a big blockbuster like this.
     The action sequences are cool and fluid, and the animation is still stunning. This time, only DeBois returned to direct, but I think he does a good job on his own. It's not as faithful to Cowell's book as the first, as far as I've heard, but I think it works as it's own thing altogether.
      How to Train Your Dragon 2 is a great movie. It's got humor, likable characters, amazing animation, and an original concept. Not to mention a fair deal of exciting action. My only complaint: the title. Why not How to Fight With Dragons? How to Fly Your Dragon? Something a little more creative, as there's not really any training in the movie. But I digress, it's a minor nitpick. Again, check it out. 4/5 stars.

A brown haired boy, holding a helmet by his side, his friends and a black dragon behind him. Dragons are flying overhead. (Images: Wikipedia)

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Transformers-Age of Extinction: How does one make an action scene boring? Michael Bay knows!

Today, I look at the box office success (the amount of people who go to these movies and actually enjoy them is endlessly perplexing) with a huge budget and an equally large running time.

Transformers, Age of Extinction:
In Texas, an "inventor" by the name of Cade Yeager is raising his whiny teenage daughter and trying to make it as a robotics engineer while making no money. He comes across an old semi-truck and figures out it is a transformer. Since the Chicago War (the battle from the end of the third movie), all transformers, good and evil, have been blamed for the massive casualties and property damage, and are being hunted down by the military. His surfer/moron buddy calls the government-run service for "disposing" of an old transformer, because the ad promises no problems and a pretty large cash reward. However, instead they get a small group of CIA agents and special ops soldiers, who threaten Cade, his daughter, and their friends. The small group of heroes is rescued when the injured transformer turns out to be none other than Optimus Prime. He leads them to his increasingly small group of transformers, and they begin a quest to take down the corrupt government officials who are targeting them as well as recover The Seed, an alien bomb used to reform planets to make them habitable by transformers.
     Surprisingly, it was pretty good. And by that I mean I didn't hate it as much as the previous two abominations to come out of this franchise. This one wasn't quite as cringe-worthy, I will give it that. None of the human characters from the previous films return, which is a good thing for the most part (I do miss the soldiers though, those dudes were cool supporting characters and I'm sad to see them go). The only transformers that return are Optimus, Bumblebee, and a little annoying one that talks in ebonics. The others are completely new and useless but treated as though they've always been around. But the worst thing is the run-time: good god, this fucking thing doesn't end. I was sitting in the movie and thinking about when it was going to end, as the climax was dragging on for some time. I check my phone: there was an hour left, it wasn't the climax, it was the second act! A second act that consisted mostly of a 40-minute action sequence.
   That brings me to my next complaint: the action. As the title of this review suggests, I didn't like the battle scenes. I don't care so much for these films because Michael Bay pays so much attention to explosive and CG-heavy action sequences that it seems like the writing on the human characters comes secondary. That wouldn't be a problem for me (I like dumb action movies from time to time), except that he decides to spend the first half hour only focusing on human characters, for the most part. So for the first 30-40 minutes, I just got bland, annoying, poorly acted, underwritten human characters who I couldn't give less of a shit about. The other major complaint, which the title also suggests, is that the action scenes are so chock-full of activity (usually between characters I don't care about or relate to in any way) and drag on for so long that they cease to become entertaining and becoming boring. Actually a better choice of words would be overwhelming and exhausting. I actually felt exhausted from watching half of a movie. I didn't even know that could happen. I felt like I had exercised, I just wanted to go to bed. That's right: Michael Bay has made it possible to get me to fall asleep from explosions and guns and bloodshed. I just don't know how he does it. The only cool bits were Optimus' first encounter with the Cemetery Wind task force and Mark Wahlberg's intense fight with an evil CIA agent in a Chinese shantytown during the climactic final battle. Those were actually fairly entertaining sequences; however, the amount of garbage I had to endure to get to those left me overwhelmed and unable to fully enjoy them. Just look up clips on YouTube, sitting through the whole movie isn't worth it.
    The acting wasn't anything special, either. Mark Wahlberg is definitely more charismatic and action movie-ready than Shia LaBeouf could ever be, but I couldn't buy him as Cade. This was a problem in The Happening, too: Wahlberg has to act as a vulnerable and book-wormy scientist/inventor, despite the fact he's a muscular action hero type. Wahlberg is also a Texan, but doesn't at all lose his heavy Boston accent. Stanley Tucci basically recreates Jon Tuturo's character from previous installments, and God bless him, he fucking tries. You can tell Tucci was trying to have fun with the movie, but just like that guy who tries to keep an obviously dying and increasingly awkward party going, it's not fun: it's sort of pathetic and sad. And that's not to insult Tucci at all, he's a fine actor and I hope he's in more stuff, but it's meant to show how even the best actors can be dragged down by an awful script. Kelsey Grammar plays the main antagonist: Harold Attinger, a veteran CIA agent who distrusts and hates transformers who invented the Cemetery Wind task force to kill all transformers on Earth. Peter Weller returns to voice Optimus Prime, and sounds just as cool and bad-ass as ever, although it's sad to think such a talented voice actor basically just does these movies now. John Goodman voices Hound, a military-like and kind of aggressive transformer who is loyal to Optimus. Mark Ryan voices both the kind of immature but brave Bumblebee (who is transformed from the wise transformer at the end of the first movie to an emotional and reckless teenager-type character) and the villain Lockdown, a transformer/galactic bounty hunter who mercilessly hunts down other transformers for the government and for his alien employers. John DiMaggio (Futurama, Adventure Time) voices both Leadfoot and Crosshairs, who are just sort of there; a shame, as DiMaggio is a pretty talented voice actor and is really funny. Drift is voiced by Ken Watanabe. For some reason, they made this Autobot a stereotypical Japanese samurai caricature but one that turns into both a helicopter an the Bugatti, a European sports car. That totally makes sense. Frank Welker (an insanely talented voice actor who originally voiced Megatron on the animated series) is Galvatron, a wasted villain who is only in the movie for like 20 minutes, and is the reincarnation of Megatron, though they imply he will be back soon. Robert Foxworth voices Ratchet, the kind medic Autobot who is only in the movie for 5 minutes, and Reno Wilson voices Brains, the annoying-as-all-hell former Decepticon turned Autobot helper.
All of the Autobots are no longer intelligent or wise as before, but emotional, reckless has-beens (Bumblebee loses it because he sees an ad calling him old and ugly), and Optimus comes off as more of an idiotic avenger than a sagely bad-ass like before.
    The rest of the human cast are as follows: Nicola Peltz as Tessa, Cade's young daughter (who is attractive, but a terrible actress); Jack Reynor as Shane, Tessa's annoying boyfriend (who has one of the worst Irish accents I've ever heard in my life, it's barely even an accent at all); Sophia Myles as Darcy, Tucci's British assistant; Li Bingbing as Su, the owner of Tucci's company's Chinese factory (also attractive, slightly better actress); T.J. Miller is Lucas, Cade's good friend and surfer dude (the "comic relief", although I will admit he got me to chuckle once or twice); James Bachman as Tucci's scientist employee (a better comic relief); Kassem G (YouTuber) as another scientist at Tucci's factory; and Titus Welliver as Savoy, the leader of the Cemetery Wind squad and Attinger's right-hand man, the secondary human antagonist. Going into details is pointless because almost all of them are underwritten caricatures. None of them feel like real, relatable people in the slightest.
   The visual effects are actually okay, except for the transformium. Yeah, I know, right? The only name they could think of for the substance that can transformium itself into objects was "transformium". Almost as bad as "unobtanium" from Avatar. The transformium resembles a computer screensaver. The special effects on the robots are actually pretty good, and you can actually distinguish between the robots this time around because there are fewer of them and they all have distinctive colors.
   The writing by Ehren Krueger (the man behind the last two films as well as Scream 3) is pretty bad. No offense, but this is worse than even Scream 3 or Transformers: Dark of the Moon. One of my favorite bad lines in this movies is when the CIA shows up at Cade's farm, Cade claims they have no right as they have no warrant, and Savoy responds "My face is my warrant!" I actually burst out laughing at how badly written and delivered that line was. Even the phrase "Chicago War" makes no sense, as it was one battle. What "war" only lasts for a few hours?
    The directing by Michael Bay, full of lens flares, slow-motion, and confusing CG fights, is even worse than the bland writing. The saddest part: Bay was once a promising action director, making fun movies like The Rock and Bad Boys. Even the first Transformers was an entertaining, if dumb and silly, popcorn movie. Now he's become the laughingstock of Hollywood and one of the least-respected directors in the industry, especially concerning critics' opinions.
   Transformers: Age of Extinction may be better than the previous two installments, but it's still a steaming pile of shit. It's full of bad acting, bland writing, confusing action sequences, flashy cinematography (which is more distracting than cool), and it just drags on forever. It feels longer than Lawrence of Arabia and Lord of the Rings (the whole trilogy, plus the two Hobbit movies) combined. It also is filled to the brim with blatant, sometimes hilarious, product placement. (The scene where Marky Mark chugs a Bud Light in full view of the camera is pretty funny.) The only positive things I can say is that Wahlberg and Tucci at least try to make the best of it, and the visuals can be nice at times, but none of this is enough to make me recommend it to anyone. 1/5 stars.

Transformers Age of Extinction Poster.jpeg (Image: Wikipedia)

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

The Planet of the Apes Prequels: Excellent films that show us a more sympathetic side of the primates

Today, I look at the highly-anticipated sequel to 2011's Rise of the Planet of the Apes, and also take a look at that film as well.

Rise of the Planet of the Apes:
In San Francisco, Dr. Will Rodman, a young and optimistic scientist at the Gen-Sys corporation, is testing a new cure for his father's Alzheimer's (ALZ-112) on lab chimpanzees. He takes a uniquely intelligent ape named Caesar (based on the ape leader from the original Planet of the Apes series) home with him, and raises him almost as his own child. He is impressed with Caesar's smarts and complex personality, and Caesar looks up to him as a father. However, things take a turn for the worse when Caesar viciously attacks an irritated neighbor after Will's forgetful father crashes the neighbor's car, mistaking it for his own. Will is forced to turn Caesar over to an ape "sanctuary", run by an abusive father and son. Caesar plans an escape with an intelligent orangutan named Maurice and several other apes, and Will has trouble at work when his greedy and selfish boss begins testing ALZ-112 on other apes without seeing the full array of side-effects, and even orders human trials done. Things begin spiraling out of control when it's revealed that there's a possibility of ALZ-112 being potentially deadly to humans, while giving apes the advantages of more smarts and enhanced strength...
     This movie was pleasant surprise, as the last attempt at reviving the beloved franchise resulted in the abominable 2001 remake by Tim Burton, that tries to out-twist the original and completely fails. The director Rupert Wyatt had only done one film before this one (The Escapist, a well-made and entertaining prison break story), and it's impressive to see what he could accomplish with this second outing. The pace is a little slower than previous Apes films, but it's well worth it.
    James Franco took over for his friend Tobey Maguire after the latter dropped out after some talks with producers, and Franco does a great job as out lead human character Will. He's charismatic, funny, smart, and his growing relationship with Caesar is genuinely heart-warming. Speaking of which, Andy Serkis delivers another mesmerizing motion-capture performance as Caesar, who is a reboot of the ape revolutionary character from the original films. Caesar starts out as innocent, compassionate, and sweet, but grows up throughout the film. While remaining relatively compassionate, he becomes more confident, stronger, and hardens a little bit. Freida Pinto (Slumdog Millionaire) appears as Caroline, a primatologist who is also Will's girlfriend and Caesar's co-caretaker. John Lithgow has a supporting role as Charles Rodman, Will's aging father who suffers from Alzheimer's and must remain in the house, which breaks Will's heart. Brian Cox (Manhunter, X2: X-Men United, The Campaign, Red) and Tom Felton (Harry Potter, Belle) play the father and son John and Dodge Langdon (both of their names are references to astronauts in the original Planet of the Apes), who run the ape sanctuary. Dodge is cruel to the primates and John is indifferent to them; not the people I'd want running an ape shelter. David Oyelowo (The Butler, Lincoln, MI-5, The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency, Jack Reacher) has a semi-villainous part as Will's boss and greedy douche Steven Jacobs (his name is a reference to Arthur P. Jacobs, the producer of the original Apes film). Jacobs isn't really the big villain of the movie (there isn't one, really), but he definitely can frustrate you with his arrogance and ruthless business tactics; I sure was pissed at him by the end. Tyler Labine (Reaper, Monsters University, Tucker and Dale vs. Evil) plays Will's buddy and ape handler at Gen-Sys: Robert Franklin. Jamie Harris (Jared Harris' brother) has a small part as Rodney, a kind ape caretaker at the sanctuary who is ridiculed by Dodge for his level of care for the animals. David Hewlett and Chelah Horsdal (both former Stargate actors) have minor roles: the former is Will's agitated neighbor who is attacked by Caesar; the latter is a nurse who cares for Charles. Karin Konoval has a mo-cap part as Maurice the Orangutan (a reference to Maurice Evans, the actor who portrayed orangutan Dr. Zaius in the originals), who is kind to Caesar and becomes his most trusted ally. She also has a part as Birght Eyes (a reference to the nickname given to Charlton Heston in the original), Caesar's mother. Terry Notary and Richard Ridings have parts as Rocket and Buck, two apes (the former is the ex-alpha male, the latter is a gorilla) who join Caesar in his fight against humanity. Both names are references to cast/crew members on the original films (Norman Rockett, the set designer, and Buck Kartalian, an actor who portrayed a gorilla in two of the films). Christopher Gordon has a supporting part in the latter half of the film as Koba, a violent ape who resents all humans for his life in captivity, who is recognizable by his scars from years of experimentation and abuse. He is tested on by Jacobs' men, which increases his intelligence and aggressiveness. Ironically, bonobo apes (the ape type Koba is) are typically peaceful and resolve conflicts through complex sexual behaviors, not fighting. Koba is not a reference to anything withing the film series, but a nickname Joseph Stalin used before Lenin's revolution, which comes into play in the next movie.
    The special effects are remarkable, especially the apes' facial features, which are extremely expressive and detailed. The action sequences aren't half-bad, either, especially the climactic confrontation on the Golden Gate Bridge, featuring apes on horseback and gorillas tackling helicopters out of the sky. Though the ending isn't exactly as exciting as many people would probably like, but it's satisfying, and leaves a lot of possibilities open for the sequel.
    Rise of the Planet of the Apes may be a bit slow for some viewer's tastes, but it's emotionally gratifying and has a great cast, as well as phenomenal special effects and a cool end credits sequence. It's an impressive movie prequel and reboot with a lot of re-watch factor. 4/5 stars.
Rise of the Planet of the Apes Poster.jpg


Dawn of the Planet of the Apes:
Now here's what everyone wants to hear about...
10 years after the outbreak of the Simian Flu (ALZ-112 virus, which enhances apes but kills humans), humanity is on the brink of annihilation. Intelligent ape colonies are flourishing in the countryside, while numbers of human colonies are dwindling. Caesar is the leader of a large and fearsome ape colony near San Francisco, in the Redwood Forest Park. Members of a human group located in the city stumble upon two young apes while scavenging for supplies in the forest, and while things are initially tense between the two factions, they grow to like and respect one another, thanks largely in part to the cooperation of Caesar and a kind human named Malcolm and his son and girlfriend. However, some members of both factions are still bitter towards each other (most notably the abused ape Koba), and begin going behind their respective leaders' backs to accomplish their own goals, while leads to tensions being raised once more, which leads to numerous conflicts, and even an all-out war between the colonies... Will the colonies recover from this mini-war, or will they wipe each other out for good?
    This movie is a lot darker and more intense than the previous film, which is a welcome change of pace. This time around the director is Matt Reeves, and underrated filmmaker whose credits include Cloverfield, TV series Felicity, and vampire remake Let Me In. He does an excellent job with this movie, so I hope this gives his career a much-needed boost and leads to more high-profile projects down the line.
    Andy Serkis gets top-billing this time as Caesar, now a more hardened leader and warrior, with a wife and two sons. He's still compassionate towards humans, but puts apes first now, and can be aggressive and brutal when he needs to be, which is luckily not too often. Caesar's reconciliation with humankind is pretty touching, and Serkis is able to pull off a lot of complex emotions with very little dialogue and has to work through layers of digital makeup. Jason Clarke (Zero Dark Thirty, Lawless, The Great Gatsby) replaces Franco as our human lead: Malcolm, a survivor and an all-around good guy who bonds with Caesar. Gary Oldman has a small role as Dreyfus, the leader of the human colony who wants to reach out to other survivors in the world and who resents apes for the Simian Flu that killed his family. He's not exactly a villain like the trailers painted him, more of a man who holds misguided views because of something that happened to him. Keri Russell (Felicity, August Rush, Mission: Impossible III) has a role as Malcolm's girlfriend Ellie, who was also a nurse before the outbreak. Kodi Smit-McPhee (The Road, Let Me In, ParaNorman, Romulus My Father, Romeo and Juliet) is Alexander, Malcolm's young son, who bonds with Maurice. Kirk Acevedo (Oz, Band of Brothers, Fringe, The Thin Red Line, The Walking Dead) appears in a minor role as Carver, an on-edge survivor who distrusts the primates. Kevin Rankin (Breaking Bad, Trauma, White House Down) has a small part as Dreyfus' friend McVeigh. Toby Kebbell (Dead Man's Shoes, War Horse, RockNRolla) replaces Christopher Gordon as Koba, who shifts from an anti-hero role to a more villainous one, as he undermines Caesar's authority several times during the film, despite starting out as his friend. Karin Konoval reprises her role as Maurice the Orangutan. Judy Greer (Archer, Carrie, It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, The Descendants, Arrested Development, Married) appears as Cornelia (a reference to the original Apes character Cornelius), Caesar's beloved wife and mother to his sons. Speaking of which, Nick Thurston has a role as Caesar's rebellious son Blue Eyes. Doc Shaw appears as Ash, son of Rocket and Blue Eyes' best friend. Terry Notary reprises his role as Rocket, the former alpha male of the ape community and close ally of Caesar. James Franco "cameos" in video footage from the previous film.
      The special effects are even more stunning than before, and the action set-pieces are epic: the intense opening hunting sequence shows us how evolved and intelligent the apes now are and shows off their hunting skills; the short fight between Caesar and a defiant ape (who I will not name) is bloody and surprisingly raw for an all-CG fight; the climactic gun battle sequence is exhilarating but also tragic and shows the horror of needless war, even if it is with talking apes; and the final battle atop the ruins of the Golden Gate Bridge is epic to say the least.
       Dawn of the Planet of the Apes is not just a fun summer movie, it's the best film I've seen thus far. It's enthralling, dark but also inspiring, and even can make you shed some tears. It tops the first film in ways I didn't know possible, which is the best thing I think I can say about it. 4.5/5 stars.

A chimp brandishes an automatic rifle while astride a rearing horse. (Images: Wikipedia)
     

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Deliver Us From Evil: Scott Derrickson's latest horror effort

Today, I look at the new horror film from cult director Scott Derrickson (The Exorcism of Emily Rose, Sinister, The Outer Limits, Marvel's upcoming Dr. Strange) and acclaimed producer Jerry Bruckheimer (The Rock, Bad Boys, Pirates of the Caribbean, CSI, Beverly Hills Cop, Con Air, Black Hawk Down, Flashdance, Top Gun, and many more).

Deliver Us From Evil:
The film opens in Iraq, following a group of soldiers who stumble upon a mysterious underground shrine while on a mission. We quickly cut to three years later in New York City, following dedicated cop Ralph Sarchie, who investigates a domestic violence call, and discovers the culprit is an ex-soldier whose fingertips are chaffed and bloody. He then investigates a call from the Bronx Zoo, where a woman has seemingly gone insane at random, throwing her child into an empty lion pit (the pit was closed for refurbishments), clawing at bystanders, and running off into unknown parts of the zoo. Sarchie and his partner find her near the carousel, violently hissing and clawing at the ground until her fingertips bleed and scar. Sarchie also investigates a house whose occupants claim the basement is haunted by an evil presence. During these investigations, Sarchie befriends an "undercover" priest who believes these seemingly random and eerie happenings are the work of a demonic presence. Sarchie, a skeptic who "grew out of" his faith, doesn't believe these pretty outrageous claims, but as things get stranger and stranger, Sarchie suspends his disbelief for the sake of solving the case... and protecting his family. What is the real cause of these happenings? If there is a demonic presence (spoiler: there is), what does it want? What does this have to do with that Iraq War scene I mentioned? That's for you to find out.
     I am a fan of Scott Derrickson, as people probably have figured out by now. His 2012 effort Sinister is one of my favorite horror movies of the past 20 years and one of the best films of 2012, in my opinion. His 2005 venture The Exorcism of Emily Rose may be slightly overrated, but it's still an effective and impressive scary movie, especially for a debut feature film. The only major blot on his short filmography is 2008's dull and disappointing The Day The Earth Stood Still, a bland remake of a science fiction masterpiece. So, if you can't tell, I was pretty excited for this new film. I can't really say it disappointed, despite many people criticizing it.
    Eric Bana is an underrated actor, despite his impressive resume (Chopper, Full Frontal, Black Hawk Down, Troy, Hulk, Lone Survivor, Munich, Star Trek, Mary and Max, Funny People, Romulus My Father, Deadfall, Finding Nemo). I felt like he did a good job in this movie. He pulled off the gruff, jaded New York cop role really well. Edgar Ramirez (Carlos, Che, Zero Dark Thirty, Wrath of the Titans) has a prominent role as the priest Mendoza, a man with a dark past who found peace by joining the priesthood. I thought Ramirez was really likable in this movie, and he had a calming presence. Joel McHale (Community, Spider-Man 2, Ted) plays Sarchie's funny and sarcastic partner Butler. He was undoubtedly the best character in the movie. Olivia Munn (Attack of the Show, The Newsroom, Magic Mike) appears in a minor supporting role as Ralph's caring wife Jen, who worries about her stressed husband's state of mind. I don't know why, but in every one of these types of horror movies the main character is portrayed by an underrated actor (Patrick Wilson in Insidious and The Conjuring, Ethan Hawke in Sinister, Eric Bana in this), whose wife is played by an underrated hot actress (Rose Byrne in Insidious, Vera Farmiga in The Conjuring, Juliet Rylance in Sinister, and Olivia Munn in this). It's like a new cliche. Sean Harris (The Borgias, 24 Hour Party People, Red Riding, Brighton Rock, Southcliffe, Prometheus) plays Santino, an ex-soldier with some issues. Chris Coy (Treme, True Blood) has a role as Jimmy, another ex-soldier with some form of PTSD. Overall, the cast does okay, they look genuinely scared throughout the runtime.
   The story isn't exactly original, and it actually takes liberties with the material. It's based on a 2001 book (Beware the Night by Ralph Sarchie and Lisa Collier Cool), which probably means the events in the book took place in the 90's or maybe even earlier, but for sake of the film, they updated the material to 2013. However, Derrickson took his experience on other films and incorporated some elements into this one. For instance, Christopher Young returns as composer from The Exorcism of Emily Rose and Sinister (which had an okay original score, but an amazing soundtrack). The exorcism sequence in the film is pretty intense, and Derrickson probably took hints from not only The Exorcist, but his own film: Emily Rose. There's also a flashback sequence done in a Super 8 filming style, obviously lifted from his previous feature Sinister. Like Sinister, this film has a cool sound design and unique soundtrack for a horror film (although not nearly as unsettling or original as Sinister's was). The film actually employs a lot of music by The Doors, which is a bit laughable at times, but sometimes it worked pretty well, like in a scene in a darkened hallway where suddenly, the song "People Are Strange" begins playing, and it's actually kind of creepy. There's also a visually striking end credits sequence that has "Break On Through (To The Other Side)" accompanying it.
     Deliver Us From Evil may be cliched and filled with jump scares, but it's not terrible. It's not as original or jolting as Sinister was, but I wouldn't bash the movie either. It has some talented actors, a director who knows how to get under my skin, some cool visuals, and is able to frighten but also sort of inspire. However, the spiritual overtone may be a little off-putting to some, especially more skeptical-minded viewers (I consider myself fairly skeptical as well), and I get it. But I still say to give this movie a chance anyway. It's no classic and will probably be forgotten fairly soon, but it's entertaining enough. I actually enjoyed it a lot, and was shocked to see so many people hating on it. I feel like people are giving this movie too much shit. As much as I enjoyed The Conjuring and Insidious: Chapter 2 (as evidenced by me placing them in my favorites of the year list), you have to admit they weren't exactly perfect, either. They had some flaws and laughable moments, as any horror movie does. My point is, don't bash Deliver Us too much. Sure it's unoriginal, but what horror movie isn't nowadays? 3.5/5 stars.

Deliver Us from Evil (2014 film) poster.jpg (Image: Wikipedia)

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Transformers-Age of Extinction: Michael Bay's at it again! (Guest reviewer)

This is a review from one of my good friends who wished to share his opinion on a film on my blog. I have not edited it in any way except for changing the font and adding the poster. All typos, spacial problems, etc. are the fault of either the author or the change in formatting when I copied this over from his Google doc. Also: a Spoiler Warning, as I believe he does go into details about the plot at some point. Enjoy!:



Hello folks, I am not Matt Cotter, I am a guest reviewer who strongly urged Matt not to see Transformers: Age of Extinction after seeing it myself. The only reason I saw it was because I figured it would be better than waiting at a walmart in the middle of the desert for several hours while I wait for a ride after my car broke down. I have never been more wrong in my life.
In the fourth (and pray to God that it is the last) installment to the Transformers series Mark Whallberg plays Cade Yeager a highly overbearing father struggling to make something that will define his career as a freelance inventor. The movie opens on alien spaceships killing the dinosaurs, the metallic remains are then found by a lady of ambiguous importance. Next, we join Cade and his partner Lucas, a hippie/surfer/the movie’s comic relief, buying a movie theater that serves no importance to the plot other than the fact that it has the dying truck form of Optimus Prime in it. Seriously though, what is the significance of the theater? It only makes movie-goers curious as to how the hell a giant semi truck made it through the doors of the building. Cade brings the semi home with hopes of restoring it. Cade’s daughter is beginning to lose faith as to whether or not he will be able to put her through college and Lucas is worried about whether or not he will get his last paycheck. A fight sequence tells us that all transformers are being hunted because even though they saved the world, they started the conflict. This doesn’t make much sense right off the bat though because the CIA uses a transformer to kill another one. We then learn that the CIA knows of Cades involvement in the harboring of Optimus Prime and they send the transformer equivalent of the Gestapo to seize him. When they find that Cade’s farm is empty we learn that Lucas ratted him out (even though in the previous scene the CIA said they caught it on a traffic cam or something along those lines). The transformer Gestapo threatens to kill Cades daughter when suddenly her secret boyfriend comes and saved the day. A car chase ensues and Lucas ends up going out like the dinosaurs and the group kind of brushes it off like they lost their favorite pair of sunglasses. Optimus takes them into hiding and Cade hacks a mini drone he stole from the CIA raid. Optimus then reunites the last remaining transformers and they plan to raid KSI, a company that the CIA ships all of the dead transformers to. After the raid it is learned that KSI is using all of the metal dinosaur fossils to make a new element they call transformium (real f**king creative guys…). Transformium can be used to fashion any object in the world, so what does KSI make? MORE TRANSFORMERS. The band of misfit robots break in to save Cade after he gets caught and then go right back into hiding. We learn that the director of the CIA’s operation against transformers is working with an evil transformer who has ulterior motives of releasing a bomb to turn people into transformium over the most populated city, Beijing. So everyone goes to Beijing to try and take this bomb called “The Seed” and KSI’s owner (I will call him Steve Jobs because 1. I forget his name and 2.he is definitely based off him) attempts to get the bomb to a safe place for extraction. During extraction the autobot’s spaceship gets shot down which leads to a battle between them and KSI’s evil transformers. When the group is about to lose hope Optimus calls for reinforcements and some badass dinosaur transformers come. They were only on screen for about 5 minutes so I don’t know why they were on the poster. It seemed like kind of a cheap way to get the protagonists out of a jam and probably made a lot of transformer fans angry (assuming the rest of the film hadn’t already). After the battle, Optimus takes the seed and blasts off into space setting up for a sequel that, if we are lucky, will never come.
Although the general idea for the storyline is pretty good, it has been done a million times and is a rather common formula: Guy meets fugitive, guy chooses to not turn fugitive in, fugitive gets guy into trouble, guy helps clear fugitives name and saves the day. Not only is it overdone but it was also poorly executed, the story had a lot of holes and plot devices that didn’t make sense at times. The visual effects were choppy, blurry, and the frame rates sucked. The CGI was horrendous at times, in a scene where two scientists are playing with transformium it changes from a my little pony to a gun and the 3D model floats and bounces in the guys hand making it look like a five year old was playing with MS paint. It seemed as if the movie was only shot at sunrise and sunset making the sun constantly shining in your eyes taking away from the terrible acting. Not only was the acting dry and forced but the characters were highly cliché and predictable. Going deeper into the bad acting the guy who played he boyfriend did the most Australian sounding Irish accent I have ever heard, correct me if you think otherwise. The bad CGI and frame rates combined with poor acting made the movie seem like an ibuprofen commercial, which brings me to my next point. The film implements product placement so blatantly it may seem like this scene from Waynes World: http://youtu.be/KjB6r-HDDI0 . Mark Whallberg even makes a show of cracking open a bud light and taking a swig after the camera pans across the street littered in bud light bottles. Shame on you Michael Bay.
I would NEVER recommend this movie to anyone, in fact I would put it on my list of movies to never watch ever.
Thank you, hope to do some reviews with you guys in the future.
Anthony


Transformers Age of Extinction Poster.jpeg (Image: Wikipedia)

Jersey Boys: Musical adaptation that's not a musical

Today, I look at Clint Eastwood's adaptation of a popular Broadway show.

Jersey Boys:
Chronicling the journeys of several musicians, this charming film shows us the rise, fall, and subsequent revival of the band Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons, a group of young men from New Jersey who struggled to be successful in the music industry in the 50's and 60's.
  Clint Eastwood directs this film with energy and slickness, but to me, it didn't feel as though he was really invested in the project. I could be wrong, but I just felt like his heart wasn't in it. Like J. Edgar, it was entertaining and interesting, but ultimately it was just there. There was nothing particularly moving, memorable, or special about it, which is odd considering Eastwood's impressive body of work. (Unforgiven, Million Dollar Baby, Play Misty for Me, Pale Rider, Invictus, etc.) I guess it just goes to show that sometimes even a great director can churn out a few underwhelming films.
   I was happy that the producers, casting directors, and Eastwood chose to cast relatively unknown actors, who are all pretty talented. John Lloyd Young reprises his role as Frankie Valli from the Broadway production, for which he won the Tony Award. He is excellent in this as well, and captures Valli perfectly, especially in the way he sings. Erich Bergen (from shows like Gossip Girl and Desperate Housewives, who bears a resemblance to Evan Peters) is not too shabby as the supporting character Bob Gaudio, the group's songwriter and keyboardist. Vincent Piazza of Boardwalk Empire and Rocket Science fame is the best character in the film: guitarist and vocalist Tommy DeVito. He's charming and funny, but also douchey and aggressive at times, making him sort of a likable asshole. Michael Lomenda is good as Nick Massi, who has an epic freakout worthy of DiCaprio or Nicholson in the film's latter half. Christopher Walken has an inadvertently funny supporting role as Gyp DeCarlo, a real-life mobster and loanshark tied to Frank Sinatra. It's funny because it's just Walken being Walken: the awkward pronunciation and emphasizing of certain words, the strange pauses in sentences, the unique facial expressions, etc. It's awesome. Mike Doyle (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, Rabbit Hole, Green Lantern) has a funny supporting role as record producer Bob Crewe, a successful entrepeneur and songwriter who is the best supporting character. Joey Russo has a funny minor part as Tommy DeVito's good friend Joe Pesci (yes, the actor Joe Pesci). In this movie, Pesci is as energetic and excitable as the characters he portrays in films, only a lot less aggressive and violent. In fact, he gets pushed around by others without much self defense, which I found humorously ironic. I can't say this for a fact, but I believe Pesci's character in Goodfellas is named after his buddy. There's no way that his old friend and (arguably) his most famous character both being named Tommy DeVito is a coincidence.
   The movie, while it has a few musical performances in it, is not, in fact, a musical. There is, however, a cool choreographed musical sequence during the credits that pays homage to the play the film is based on. Another unique aspect of the film is the breaking-the-fourth-wall tactic used in films like Ferris Bueller's Day Off and, more recently, The Wolf of Wall Street, where a character addresses the audience directly by looking into the camera as if they are aware of their presence. You don't see that used too often in movies any more, so I though it was a nice touch. Rick Elice and Marshall Brickman penned the screenplay, based on their book which they wrote for to Broadway production. It's pretty exceptional for this duo, as Elice has never written a screenplay before, and Brickman's only major ones were co-written with Woody Allen, a highly experienced writer and director.
   Despite being slightly underwhelming and not exactly emotionally impactful, Jersey Boys is an acceptable stage adaptation. Not as inventive and visually stimulating as the source material, I got the feeling Eastwood wasn't as invested in this project as he could have been. It seemed like he just wanted to get it over with by the film's latter half, where a moment that should hit hard (like a punch to the gut) gets rushed and feels forced. I would recommend you see it at a matinee at least, if not, then wait for the DVD. I'd say it's good for at least one watch, but nothing more, which is a shame coming from a director as skillful and talented as Eastwood is. 3/5 stars.

Jersey Boys Poster.jpg (Image: Wikipedia)