Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

My Must-View Halloween Picks

Hey guys! So sorry that it's been almost a year since my last post but it's been a hectic, busy year. However, I wanted to put something up for Halloween, so this is just a list of my personal picks for films I feel complete the season for me as much as pumpkin carving, eating candy corn, raking leaves, or pick up games of football. If I don't watch some of these, the season just doesn't quite feel right.

I'll include small footnotes on the ones I feel I need to comment on.

Here's my Halloween post from last year: http://mattcottermovies.blogspot.com/2016/11/my-halloween-viewing-guide.html




Horror Standards:

The Exorcist (1973): This may not be deserving of the title of scariest movie ever made, depending on your tastes, but it is still one of the most effective and engaging horror films, blending the genre with drama for a sense of respectability and authenticity rarely seen these days in the genre.

Halloween (1978): The quintessential Halloween film, which still packs in some chilling moments despite its budget and age showing, in no small part due to the performances of Donald Sutherland and Nick Castle, and the iconic score by the director John Carpenter.

The Thing (1982)

Dawn of the Dead (1978)

The Shining (1980)

An American Werewolf in London (1981)

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

Scream (1996)

Scream 2 (1997)

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974)

The Blair Witch Project (1999)

Hellraiser (1987)

The Omen (1976)

Child's Play (1988)

Dracula (1931)

Frankenstein (1931)

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931)

The Invisible Man (1933)

Cult Favorites: 

Killer Klowns from Outer Space (1988)

Nightbreed (1990)

Trick r Treat (2007)

Freaks (1932)

Evil Dead 2 (1987)

Candyman (1993)

Would You Rather? (2012)

Braindead/Dead-Alive (1992)

The Frighteners (1996)

Re-Animator (1985)

Return of the Living Dead (1987)

Jeepers Creepers (2001)

The Lost Boys (1987)

The Hunger (1983)

The Fly (1958 or 1986)

The X-Files (TV series 1993-2001)

The Blob (1958)

The Rocky Horror Picture Show (1978)

Donnie Darko (2001)

The Crow (1994)

The Monster Squad (1987)

Tales from the Crypt (TV series 1989-1996)

Creepshow (1983)

Nostalgic Picks:

Hocus Pocus (1993): Despite the at times cringe-worthy humor and overacting, and very early 90s feel, it has unmistakable and strange charm and authenticity that redeems it completely, while being strangely very entertaining

It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown (1966)

The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949): You can choose to skip the Mr. Toad segment, as though it's good in its own right and has something of a fall feel with the color palate, it's not really the segment that best sets the tone- that would be the classic adaptation of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow

Casper (series of shorts, or 1995 film)

Mickey's House of Villains (2001)

The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)

Corpse Bride (2005)

Scooby-Doo! Where Are You? (1969-1972)

Goosebumps (TV series 1995-1998)

Are You Afraid of the Dark? (TV series 1990-1996, 1999-2000)

The Munsters (TV series 1964-1966)

Critters (1988)

The Witches (1990)

Stephen King's IT (1990)

Comedy:

Beetlejuice (1988)

The Addams Family (1991)

The Addams Family Values (1993)

It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, episodes "Who Got Dee Pregnant?" (2008) and "The Maureen Ponderosa Wedding Massacre" (2012)

Shaun of the Dead (2004)

Young Frankenstein (1974)

South Park, episodes "Pinkeye" (1997), "Spookyfish" (1998), "Korn's Groovy Pirate Ghost Mystery" (1999), "The Death of Eric Cartman" (2005), "Cartman's Incredible Gift" (2004), "Hell on Earth 2006" (2006), "A Nightmare on Face Time" (2012), and "Sons of Witches" (2017)

Ghostbusters (1984)

The Simpsons- Treehouse of Horror (TV episodes, 1990-present): standouts

Odd Ones (not really cult nor nostalgic nor classic): 

Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)

The Faculty (1998)

Interview with the Vampire (1994)

Eight Legged Freaks (2002)

Sinister (2012)

The Cabin in the Woods (2012)

Bravo's 100 Scariest Movie Moments (2003): This five-part 2003 TV special may have had sequels, but this one is still the best. Mixing in interviews from horror icons, genre nerds, renowned critics, comedians, and just random celebrities, it creates a real cultural portrait for some of these movies and their impact to not just the horror fandom, but the general public as well.


Happy viewing, and Happy Halloween!



Images:


By Source, Fair use,

By Warner Bros. - Impawards, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=12964665

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10426100

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5698901

Sunday, December 25, 2016

Non-traditional Christmas picks: Year Two

Merry Christmas! I figured I'd again list some movies, TV episodes, and specials I feel are terribly underrated and/or just a little unknown.

The Hunt (a horribly depressing and intense 2012 Danish drama with a climax during the holiday season)
Arthur's Perfect Christmas
When Harry Met Sally (sort of an all seasons story but key scenes during the holidays)
Justice League: "Comfort and Joy"
Scooby Doo! Where Are You?: "That's Snow Ghost"
Batman- The Animated Series: "Holiday Knights," "Christmas with the Joker, "Heart of Ice"
Nip/Tuck: "Joy Kringle," "Duke Collins," "Reefer"
American Horror Story: "Unholy Night" (a correction from the way I mistitled the episode from last year)
Arthur Christmas
The Town Santa Forgot
Rise of the Guardians
Mean Girls (key scenes during Christmas)
Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: "Alpha's Magical Christmas" (some nostalgia)
Ernest Saves Christmas
A Very Merry Muppet Christmas Movie
A Muppet Family Christmas
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (set at winter, but no cheer here)
Jingle All the Way (some so-bad-it's-funny)
Krampus
Prancer
Santa Claus: The Movie
Santa Claus (1959) (some hilarious and bizarre cult Mexican cinema)
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians
Any of the classic Nicktoons or Cartoon Network specials
The Night Before
Batman: Sub-Zero
Beowulf (has a winter vibe)
Hawaii Five-O: "Mele Kalikimaka," "Hana 'a'a Makehewa"
Batman: Arkham Origins (a video game, not a film)
Reindeer Games (not really a good movie, but a bit of dumb fun)
Edward Scissorhands
The Little Match Girl
The Wizard of Oz (now oft-forgotten as a holiday viewing favorite of the past)
Babes in Toyland (1934)
Courage the Cowardly Dog: "The Nutcracker"
The Toy that Saved Christmas
Fantasia 2000- "The Steadfast Soldier" segment
Toy Story (ends at Christmastime and revolves around toys)
The Ref
Happy Feet
Futurama: "Xmas," "The Futurama Holiday Spectacular"
The Nice Guys
The League: "Kegel the Elf," "Thanksgiving," "The 8 Defensive Points of Hanukkah"
The Office: "Dwight Christmas," "Classy Christmas," "A Benihana Christmas," "Secret Santa," "Moroccan Christmas," "Christmas Party"
Grindhouse "Thanksgiving" segment
It's Christmastime Again, Charlie Brown
Django Unchained and The Hateful Eight (both have prominent winter feel to them)
The Last of Us (video game, winter segment)

Again, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, or whatever holiday you find yourself celebrating!

 (Image: history.com)

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

My Halloween Viewing Guide

As Halloween season seems to get earlier and earlier every year I figured I'd put out there my own personal favorite films (in addition to continuing a yearly tradition of giving a "top of the decade" list) and organize them into a sort of viewing guide for anyone looking to do some sort of crazy Halloween marathon, which I've always considered doing but never found the right time to.  Here goes nothing. Sorry this is late! Happy (belated) Halloween!

First, a few briefings, I would recommend from my own personal experience that if you wish to turn this marathon into a viewing party of sorts, to seriously consider limiting the amount of people you invite, and seriously think about who you are inviting. Whenever I've hosted a viewing party with more than 3-4 people, and these people aren't necessarily big into movies or binge-watching, the evening often devolves into just talking while movies play in the background. Now, I love going to social events with friends and parties as much as anyone, but if you actually want to watch some movies with friends, I suggest you pick a group of friends who would be ready to commit to several hours of movie watching, with maybe some funny banter.
    Now if you want to do a Halloween party, I recommend you do that separately. You can do both, but don't try to blend them because then the party/social atmosphere always eclipses the viewing aspect. I had this problem just last year, and surreally, in James Rolfe's terrific video here: http://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/31/celebrating-halloween/ , he and his friend Mike Matei hit the nail right on the head about my problem literally a day later, as this vid was posted on Halloween.
    Even when I have hosted a viewing party with friends who love movies recently, and as fun as it was, we still only watched a total of three movies. Why? Well, it often happens that we would end up talking at length ABOUT movies but never actually settling in and watching one, so hours ticked by like nothing. So if you're really thinking of strapping down for some ultimate Halloween marathon, I would suggest considering going solo or having an equally die-hard friend or two.
    Also, no one says this marathon has to be done on the date of Halloween. For one, there's lots of cool stuff to do like going to parties, going to corn mazes and haunted houses and such on the day other than sitting around watching TV, so you may consider doing it a day or two before OR just within the month of October.
     And you can spread this out into several days, too, or a few shorter bursts of bingeing is what I tend to do around the season, so feel free to mix and match or do whatever, this is by no means a definitive listing, and no one should be expected to follow this schedule to a rigid extent otherwise it's no fun at all.
    As for the films selected, these are personal favorites, and while there's plenty on here that others have on their top Halloween movies lists, there are some I have yet to find on anybody's lists. Also: you'll find not every film on this list is a horror classic or even particularly scary (or objectively good), but like I said these are personal picks, so some are nostalgic for me, others I have a genuine respect for, some are guilty pleasures, you get the gist. And for me, Halloween is all about finding that right balance of fun and scary, so I actually tend to gravitate less towards truly unnerving or disturbing films around the season.
    Just because this is a Halloween list doesn't mean a "horror" list. I love movies like The Witch and The Devil's Rejects but that doesn't mean I feel like watching them around Halloween. They just aren't really part of that fun vibe that Halloween has. Sure, something like Eraserhead or Requiem for a Dream or Irreversible may be gut-wrenching to watch, but so are a lot of other movies and you don't see those showing up on Halloween lists (not saying these films do usually show up on such lists but I think you know what I'm going for).
   Here are some videos by others I enjoy listening to about movies for their Halloween picks:

Chris Stuckmann-
(Original two-parter)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYIz6Mexxy8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuC-A2lHigo

(Guilty Pleasures)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvoG9YYtfNs

(Binge-Watch)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tijMPZFAul0

YourMovieSucks-
(Underrated horror list; however, a lot of his picks are more geared towards the genuinely chilling, so if that's not your cup of tea, or, like me, just don't think of those as "Halloween movies," maybe just save this list for another day)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPc5DGsudzs

   Now with that monster (seriously, no pun intended here, it just happened that way) list of stuff out of the way, time to delve into my picks.

1. Start the evening off light: 

I recommend something along the lines of nostalgic or ironic viewing with something like Hocus Pocus or Halloweentown, something dumb and airy and not exactly requiring attentive viewing. This will give you time to chat amongst the boring parts and laugh at the dumb moments and just kick the marathon off.

Other options include: Scooby Doo! Where Are You?, Ernest Scared Stupid, The Witches, Casper, and The Halloween Tree, and really any of the in-hindsight-awful Disney Channel movies like Tower of Terror, Phantom of the Megaplex, or Don't Look Under the Bed; again, keeping with the nostalgia/non-serious theme, these little nuggets that evoke fond childhood memories as well as uncontrollable laughter at the bad acting and production values set the mood for the evening.

2. Treading into darker territory:

Now while I said there wouldn't be too many dark/disturbing movies, this is about as dark as I'll go, and this includes the balls-to-the-wall, campy, gruesome House of 1,000 Corpses, which is Rob Zombie's rock n' roll tribute to grindhouse cinema, and the short film Off Season. Now that short is genuinely chilling and well-produced, and I really put it on here because I feel it's kind of an unknown gem that doesn't take up much time (I believe it's about 12 minutes long), and can be found for free online.
   Other options include: Misery, the ever-praised adaptation of the Stephen King novel starring James Caan and Kathy Bates in a brilliant part which won her an Oscar; Hellraiser, Clive Barker's twisted journey into the underbelly of society, using a unique and interesting ideology and mythos and introducing the world to horror icon Pinhead, leader of the S&M demon troupe the Cenobites, is still as effective and eerie today as it was in 1987; Candyman, Clive Barker's equally nightmarish and disorienting vision of urban legend culture and the power of fear, featuring an understated and excellent performance by Tony Todd; May, Lucky McKee's debut and an equal-parts upsetting, awkward, funny, depressing, and frightening character study of a young woman whose lack of social skills leads her life to fall apart around here. While that sounds like more of a drama than a horror, I assure you McKee delivers on the chills, particularly in the Halloween-set finale, which, by the way, is spoiled in the trailers so just trust me, it's worth a look; Ju-On: The Grudge, the original Japanese version, and the only version I feel is worth a look, with a cool visual style and some very creepy concepts; The Blair Witch Project; forget the sequel (most people already have), forget the abysmal-looking reboot, and forget the Paranormal Activity films, this is found footage at its best. Funnily enough, I never thought of this as much of a Halloween movie, I always watch it over summer (that's when I first saw it, and I think the woods setting always contributed to me seeing it like a summer campfire story), but it definitely fits the feeling of a good scare. A lot of people feel it's more historically significant than genuinely a good movie, but I beg to differ, as I experienced it in the perfect way: I was in sixth grade, on a camping trip in a wooded area, with my friend, watching it on an old shitty VHS copy at night. If there was ever a way to see a movie, that was it, so I may be biased because of memories of how it first effected me, but the lore and the final moments of the film still stick with me to this day. Sinister and Insidious make solid picks as well from the past few years, but I rarely watch them around this season because I kind of tired them out through rewatches soon after I first saw them. V/H/S and V/H/S/2 are mixed bags, but each have some great individual shorts (the first has "Amateur Night," "10/31/1998," and "Second Honeymoon;" the second is far more thoroughly enjoyable, but "Safe Haven" in particular sticks out, followed by "A Ride in the Park" and "Slumber Party Alien Abduction"). Skip the abysmal third film. The ABCs of Death is far too mixed a bag for me, but look up some individual ones on YouTube if you wish, just look up the sypnoses on Wikipedia and make your own call.

3. Wash that bitter taste out with some so-bad-it's-good fare:
    While it may seem a bit counter-intuitive to follow up a negative ending to a film with a bad movie to boot but these films will provoke laughter, often intentionally, and sometimes unintentionally, and some even pack in some decent scares top top it off. These type of films include Jeepers Creepers, the Francis Ford Coppola-produced mystery thriller-turned-B-monster fest which actually has a really effective ending; Eight Legged Freaks, a tongue-in-cheek David Arquette vehicle following his success with Scream, which sees the star and a group of quirky townsfolk face off with goofy giant spiders in true 50's B-movie fashion; Killer Klowns from Outer Space, my personal favorite of this genre, which is exactly what it sounds like: aliens who looks like crazy clowns land on Earth in a beach town to harvest humans in cotton candy cocoons for food. It's crazy, self-aware, silly, while also packing in a few genuine scares and some awesome 1980's effects. One of my favorite films of all time also falls in here with The Blob, the fun, poppy drive-in classic starring Steve McQueen and featuring a number of iconic scenes and a uniquely basic monster: literally a blob of slime. I definitely recommend it, it's just a fun throwback to the 50's.
    Two nostalgic television shows I find are some of the best "so-bad-it's-funny" watches are Goosebumps, and Are You Afraid of the Dark? (though the latter has some more genuinely good moments than the former). Seriously, if you or your friends have an affinity for laughing at some trash than throw on some old Goosebumps episodes and prepare to laugh till your sides hurt. While it may be long, I also recommend the 1990 miniseries Stephen King's IT. Though you've probably seen it and remember being terrified as a kid, rest assured, the boring segments are well worth powering through to see some decent child performance and the most incredible Tim Curry performance since Rocky Horror, and I mean it, Curry is having such a blast just being absolutely ham-fisted and laughable as Pennywise the Dancing Clown. His borderline cum-face as he tells little Georgie how the balloons float and his ridiculous library rant at the adult Richie have me rolling on the floor every time.
     I would also throw in watching some old 50's films like Tarantula or Them!, perhaps the homage to the genre The Lost Skeleton of Cadavra, and Troll 2 as possible alternatives. Return of the Living Dead is also a good 80's-style, pure rock n roll party type movie where nothing is subtle and it's all just a blast. Anything from Troma Entertainment, which has produced some of the most hilariously debauched and ridiculous horror movies of all time, including The Toxic Avenger, Terror Firmer, and Poultrygeist, is a great pick. If you're looking for a real trip then definitely check out the nigh-forgotten late 70's special Halloween is Grinch Night, and if you want some low-budget camp fare look at Monsters Crash the Pajama Party, whose DVD features hours of Halloween party stuff like background music, radio ads, and old unreleased shorts, so a great investment.

4. The Classics (Or Critical Darlings):
Now of course for the obligatory, can't-skip-because-it's-tradition horror genre classics. These are films that everyone seems to love or at least appreciate on some level and these are my favorites from that vast selection. I would say you have to have a Romero zombie film, so out of those, Dawn of the Dead is the one to go with, though Night of the Living Dead and Day of the Dead come close, neither have quite the same amount of striking visuals and plethora of memorable moments and lines the sequel does. The social commentary may be obvious to current viewers and bit dated (mall culture is nowhere near the heights it once was), but this doesn't drag down the movie all that much because that's just one element. The Exorcist and The Omen are, of course, terrific choices which have starkly different tones to their endings, but both are incredibly ominous films that are about as "realistic" and effective as Satan-centered movies have ever been. The Shining, another classic from the visionary Kubrick, brings with it a sense of dread and tension which has been nearly unmatched in the 30-odd years since its release. An American Werewolf in London is a terrific choice as well as it perfectly blends some oddball humor and witty dialogue with a more realistic and urban take on the werewolf legend, with groundbreaking, award-winning effects which still are talked about to this day.

    Others to choose would be the original The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, which has a documentary-style, low-budget feel that puts you right with the characters, and has a still-terrifying portrayal of madness from the Sawyer family, played by Edwin Neal, Jim Siedow, and of course, Gunnar Hansen as Leatherface, still one of the most raw looks at insanity in film history. I would also throw out John Carpenter's The Thing as a great pick, as it is still an entertaining, slow-burning thrill ride with some very impressive effects and a cast of terrific character actors led by Kurt Russell. And the score by Western legend Ennio Morricone is fantastic for a man who, to my knowledge, never experimented with synth music before. The 1976 adaptation of Carrie from Brian DePalma which saw recognition of Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie for their breathtaking interpretations of the tormented and tragic Carrie and her domineering, horrifying devout mother Margaret, is another classic which should be considered.

5. Transition into Slashers, and more Action-Oriented Fare: 

     I would say that my top choices for this genre would be Scream and Scream 2 (Scream 3 and 4 if you are a completionist), the original A Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th (either the 2009 version, the original, or anywhere between II and VIII, depending on if you want a quality slasher or just something to laugh at), and of course Hitchcock's Psycho. Peeping Tom is a more genuinely unsettling British film that is from the same era as Hitchcock, and some 80's cheese like The Burning and Prom Night is always welcome. As for action, I would recommend The Crow and Nightbreed. The Crow is not only set in Halloween season, but also has a Gothic style that fits perfectly in with the likes of Batman and Spawn, and is an entertaining cult thriller starring the late Brandon Lee (Bruce Lee's son), which would've definitely shot him to mainstream stardom had he not tragically died in an onset accident. Nightbreed (more specifically The Director's Cut), is Clive Barker's underrated if a bit uneven attempt at making another series of films, based on his short story "Cabal." It has some of that weirdness and "root for the monsters" feel that Tim Burton films do, while also packing in Barker's trademark gross-out imagery. It honestly balances tones between dark epic fantasy, horror, and a bit of superhero film with the final battle feeling torn straight from the pages of a comic book like Hellboy or Spawn.
Plus, it has cult classic filmmaker David Cronenberg in the role of a murderous psychiatrist with a uniquely creepy and cool mask, who is the foil to the main hero.
    Despite the holiday settings, Silent Night, Deadly Night and particularly A Christmas Story director Bob Clark's raw Black Christmas are great choices for classic cult slashers as well, though I personally save those with the likes of Gremlins and Krampus for the Christmas season.
     Some more cult movies that are fantastic choices for fast-paced entertainment are Sam Raimi's classic horror-comedies The Evil Dead , Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness (though the earlier two are more horror, while Army is where the comedy really came out). Raimi practically invented "splatstick" (a subgenre which combines Three Stooges-esque slapstick with excessive violence and gore), which continued with Peter Jackson's early work like in Braindead/Dead-Alive (which cranks up both the vulgar humor and the gruesome violence from Evil Dead to unbelievable levels).

    Saw, the first film, is a terrific little genre thriller with a cool gimmick and a stellar cast of character actors like Cary Elwes, Danny Glover, Michael Emerson, Shawnee Smith, Tobin Bell, and Ken Leung (a few Lost alumni there). The sequels get progressively stupider but also more "satisfying" from a slasher film sense/for pure entertainment factor.

6. Try some comedies and parodies:

    For this spot of lighter fare, some of my favorites are The Simpsons: Treehouse of Horror annual specials (my personal picks from this vast selection are I, V, VI, XIII, and XIX). The parodies are amusing, the stories short enough to digest easily, and the wit of the writing staff at an all-time high. They just have so much fun with these specials and they're at this point the only reason people watch the more recent episodes.
     The Family Guy special episode "Three Kings" isn't really specifically horror but features some amusing adaptation of Stephen King works so I like it. It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia features some good Halloween episodes with "Who Got Dee Pregnant?" (extensive flashbacks to a costume party at the bar) and "The Maureen Ponderosa Wedding Massacre" (I believe their first proper Halloween episode). The character-driven dark comedy is so perfect already and it's just an excuse to watch it honestly. I'm a sucker for Sunny. And South Park; speaking of, they have some classic Halloween episodes with "Cartman's Incredible Gift," "Spookyfish," "Korn's Groovy Pirate Ghost Mystery," "A Nightmare on Face Time," "Pinkeye," "Hell on Earth 2006," and "Goth Kids 3: Dawn of the Posers."
    Other classic spooky sitcoms like The Addams Family and The Munsters provide some campy nostalgia, along with TV horror hostesses like Elvira and Vampira, and the Bay Area's old Creature Feature specials. Classic sitcoms like Roseanne, Family Matters, Perfect Strangers, and Home Improvement, as well as newer ones like The Office, have some decent if outlandish Halloween specials, though the Roseanne ones are the best and most grounded. The BBC provides some twisted black comedy in the form of Psychoville and The League of Gentlemen, which are great for lovers of British comedy and the blackest of morbid humor, like myself.
    Tim Burton's Beetlejuice and Mel Brooks' Young Frankenstein are indisputable classics of Halloween comedy, still being screened around the season to this day, so these are the most obvious choices, and they definitely still hold up. I would say The Goonies might also be a good choice, though it hasn't aged very well at all. Gremlins I see as more of a Christmas film so I wouldn't include it myself.
    Tales from the Crypt is gorey and has some more chilling episodes, but the general camp of the series gives it enough leway to fall into this category. Continuing in the tradition of tributing EC comics, George Romero, Stephen King, and Tom Savini's Creepshow is a fun, visually striking, and star-studded homage to the classic horror comics of the 50's. Fido is an indie dark comedy satire with a talented cast and a unique concept and soundtrack. Kevin Williamson's Scream series and The Faculty are teen mystery-comedy-horror films which fall loosely in here but I like them a lot so I include them and they're a good dose of 90's nostalgia.
    Re-Animator is an ultra-gorey cult schlock fest in line with Evil Dead, Demons, and Braindead in tone. The Rocky Horror Picture Show and Little Shop of Horrors (either version), are great little cult classics with some nice music and a fun atmosphere for friends to laugh at and sing along with. The 90's films based upon The Addams Family series are terrific selections as well.


7. Black-And-White for Late at Night:

    It really isn't Halloween without taking a look at some of the all-time classics that have aged well throughout generations. The Universal Classics are the best choices: Dracula, Frankenstein, The Bride of Frankenstein, The Wolf Man, The Invisible Man, The Mummy, The Creature from the Black Lagoon, the list goes on. But those are the ones that jump to my mind the most. Despite some over-the-top acting and lack of music (most of these were at the dawn of the sound age when the sound of talking itself was a novelty) are minor complaints when compared to the iconic imagery and lines, so much so these are the instant images and tropes that jump into people's minds when they think movie monsters.

    1950's monster and alien films are excellent as well. The Thing from Another World was produced by the influential Howard Hawks, known for his then-novel use of overlapping dialogue, which provides a naturalistic sense of comraderie to the men in the film and also grounds this from being pure schlock into something more. This film is on par with the more famous remake by John Carpenter, which was so influenced by this film and the short story it itself comes from that Carpenter recreated the title screen and references it in Halloween.
    Val Lewton's excellent psycholgical thrillers Cat People and The Leopard Man are extremely important and still chilling for their use of sound design, jump scares, and psychosexual subtext, all fairly uncommon for the time. Right up there is the German classic M, starring then-unknown Peter Lorre in his greatest role as a both monstrous but ultimately strangely understandable child killer (his ending speech as the mob comes to kill him actually makes us question our thirst for vigilante justice over rehabilitation for psychopaths like him), which today is one fo the most eerie noir thrillers ever made.
    Tim Burton has some terrific black and white projects as well. Vincent, his short film from 1982, is perfect Halloween fare and is featured on The Nightmare Before Christmas DVD I believe, and also on YouTube. Franken-Weenie, both the 2012 stop-motion film and the original live-action short from 1984, are very sweet and not as weird as Vincent, and are perfect for Halloween.
    RKO's original King Kong may be more categorized as an adventure film, but there's enough frightening imagery in it and a giant monster for it to be considered horror. It's pretty brutal for 1933 and also extremely technically impressive, utilizing groundbreaking camera and stop-motion effects and a full score by Max Richter, practically unheard of at the time. Without a doubt one of the best ever and more easily palatable than the 3-hour Jackson remake from 2005, though I love that one as well. This one clocks in at the more feasible 1 hour 40 mins, long for the time but now a common runtime. RKO also had the best film version of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, which raises eyebrows even today for its racy content (it was Pre-Code and therefore not subject to heavy editing), and Frederich March was nominated for an Oscar for his role. The Hyde makeup is still imitated today, portraying the animlisitic monster as almost Simian in nature.
    Toho's original Gojira, in its original Japanese cut, is a dark and foreboding disaster film, inspired by the tragic fallout of Hiroshima. The Godzilla monster can actually be taken seriously here, being portrayed as a straight-up monster and not a hero as in later films. Don't let the campy nature of later films fool you (though I love those, too), this is a melancholy and brutal film that reflects the culture of Japan in the 1950's.

8. Literary Classics: 

    These are some of the more high-caliber films, based upon Gothic literature and modern novels. Some of these are based upon the same materials as the Universal classics, but have their own distinct vision.
    Francis Ford Coppola, legendary Renaissance man and film director, directed one of my absolute favorites of this genre: Bram Stoker's Dracula. Considered the most faithful adaptation of the source novel, James V. Hart's screenplay takes some major deviations at times but to me, they elevate the material, not detract from it. Gary Oldman is fantastic as Dracula, being young and old, detestable and tragic, etc. His hairdo is a bit ridiculous in the early stages of the film, and Winona Ryder and Keanu Reeves are the weakest players here, but they are outshined by the rest of the stellar cast (including Anthony Hopkins, Cary Elwes, Richard E. Grant, Bill Campbell, Monica Bellucci, Sadie Frost, and musician Tom Waits), and the impressive and unique visual style, produced by Coppola's insistence on using often-forgotten techniques of early cinema instead of modern visual effects.
     The companion piece to this, the Kenneth Branagh-helmed Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is nowhere near as good or coherent, being far more Shakespearean and operatic than the material warrants (this may be the result of Branagh's own background in stage and screen), but it isn't as terrible as people often make it out to be, just not the best, so I would give it a shot. Again, far more faithful than most adaptations, while taking liberties and inspirations from other adaptations.
    The Hammer horror cycle, which shot Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing among others to horror stardom, is a great example of Gothic cinema. These were the first times many viewers were exposed to more faithful adaptations of the classic Gothic novels such as Dracula and Frankenstein, as well as in full color with more graphic sex and bloodshed. The best of these films, Horror of Dracula (as it's known in the US) and The Curse of Frankenstein, hold up wonderfully well.
    Tim Burton's Sleepy Hollow is pure schlock and doesn't follow the short story at all but it's a great little Halloween piece. The Oscar-nominated stop-motion short The Sandman is loosely inspired by the short story of the same name by E.T.A. Hoffman, is chilling and provides a quick and unique horror experience with terrific visuals and sound design. The original 1953 The War of the Worlds modernizes the H.G. Wells novel and has some great special effects for the time and it's in full color, another uncommon thing for the era.
    This subgenre also includes some great musicals, including Tim Burton's excellent Sweeney Todd film and Joel Schumacher's faithful and underrated adaptation of Andrew Lloyd Webber's The Phantom of the Opera, which was based on the classic French horror novel.

9. Films that center on the actual holiday:

Now for films that are more specifically geared toward the real holiday, finally. These are films that really have to do with the date and the traditions surrounding it, making them the perfect picks for a Halloween viewing session, or just capture the spirit a lot more than others.
    While it is technically more a general slasher, it is far too iconic and important a film to ignore, that really does have a feeling of Halloween spirit to it, so John Carpenter's original Halloween is a pick to obvious to not make the list. Here is James Rolfe's video on the film, coupled with his plan on how to make the viewing of it on Halloween night perfect:http://cinemassacre.com/2011/10/24/halloween-3/
    Also highly recommended is the underrated and often unfairly hated Halloween III: Season of the Witch, which was intended to be the beginning of the series as an anthology after Michael Myers' death in Halloween II. This third film has a great score by John Carpenter himself and ultimately is far more centered on the roots and spirit of the holiday than even the original, and the plot of the villain is a hell of a lot darker.

    My ultimate pick, however, for getting into the spirit of the holiday, would be Michael Dougherty's Trick r Treat, which was rushed into a limited release before going to DVD in 2007 for some reason despite being planned as a major release. It has slowly built a cult following over the years. It is just dripping with Halloween atmosphere, and functions as a black comedy/horror anthology exploring every possible aspect of the holiday. Everything from the impressive special effects, refusal to shy away from darker moments, coupled with the dark humor and commitment to authentically replicating the feel of Halloween night (hand-carved jack-o-lanterns, all unique, adorn the entire film) make this an absolute joy to watch.
    Let's not forget the dark and morbid but critically acclaimed cult hits Ginger Snaps and Donnie Darko, which have a spooky feel for the season, as well as featuring Halloween prominently in major scenes. Dark indie director Jeremy Saulnier's black comedy Murder Party is an up-and-coming favorite for fans of something a bit bloody and different. Even the frankly cheesy Goosebumps episode "The Haunted Mask" captures the spirit of the evening pretty well.

10. Childhood Specials:

Now, after celebrating the holiday in a complete way, close out the evening, or welcome the rising sun, with a nostalgic trip back to childhood. My personal picks that I can't go through the season without watching: It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown! and The Nightmare Before Christmas. The former is not always loved these days for being slow and kind of old-fashioned, but it has such a unique charm and relaxing quality and puts me right in the spirit of the season. The music, the characters and jokes, as well as the inclusion of almost everything fall related into the story (from Halloween parties and games and trick or treating to rolling in leaves and playing football) are redeeming of any minor faults in the animation, and so I say it is essential.
    The latter was actually directing by Henry Selick, who has since directed numerous beloved and twisted animated features, but is still very much Tim Burton's vision. The short poem (narrated by Christopher Lee) is also available as a special feature on the DVD and is absolutely worth a look this season. This one practically needs no introduction, as it is both a classic Halloween tale and a Christmas movie, so it capture the essence of the two best holidays perfectly.
     Disney's Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad is also a necessary fall selection. The Mr. Toad segment can be skipped optionally as it really doesn't have to do with fall or Halloween, but it too is an excellent short. But the Sleepy Hollow segment is definitely the big hook of the film, as the music and narration by Bing Crosby is timeless and mixes humor with the horror, and the look and feel of the short perfectly captures the harvest season, and the final confrontation between Ichabod and the Horesman is so fluent and beautifully animated and exciting, it makes the somewhat slow and aimless first half of the story come together perfectly.
     A newer choice is the genuinely eerie and brilliantly directed Coraline (there's Henry Selick, again), based on Neil Gaiman's chilling young adult novella, which scared kids and adults alike. Overlooked specials gaining a cult following (some ironically, some for genuine talent behind them) include The Worst Witch, Casper Saves Halloween, Fat Albert's Halloween, The Halloween Tree, and Garfield's Halloween. Tim Burton's Corpse Bride and FrankenWeenie are heartwarming and incredibly charming little movies, as are ParaNorman and Hotel Transylvania (which has its share of dumb moments, such as the final musical number, but also features incredibly lively animation).
    The TV specials I mentioned before Home Improvement, Roseanne, Family Matters, etc. also offer some 80's and 90's cheese, and cartoons like Spongebob Squarepants, The Batman, Invader ZIM, Grim Adventures, and Courage the Cowardly Dog, among others, offer some darker fare for the Halloween season.
     TV classics like The X-Files, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Charmed, Twin Peaks, The Twilight Zone, and Tales from the Crypt are another excellent source of some short-term horror for those not looking for a whole feature. A Twin Peaks marathon would provide a genuinely creepy and mind-bending Halloween night for sure. My favorites- at least as far as straight horror- from the anthology series are: The X- Files: "Home," "Humbug," "Fire," and "Jersey Devil." The Twilight Zone: "The Masks," "Nick of Time," "To Serve Man," "The Monsters are Due on Maple Street," "Eye of the Beholder," "Printer's Devil," and "Nightmare at 20,000 Feet." (The Twilight Zone movie is another terrific choice which retells some classic episodes as well as newer stories.) Tales from the Crypt: "Three's a Crowd," "Dead Wait," "Til Death," "Dig That Cat, He's Real Gone," "Collection Completed," "The Third Pig," "Strung Along," "The New Arrival," "Split Personality," "People Who Live in Brass Hearses," "None But the Loneley Heart," "Only Skin Deep," "Death of Some Salesman," "Report from the Grave," and "Last Respects." (Not to mention the motion comics featured on the DVDs being very entertaining.)

    Some oddball choices on the last minute here are Bag of Bones, Idle Hands, and The Skeleton Key, just some stray observations I figured I'd throw in here.

Anyways, again sorry this is late, it depresses me I had nothing up for October this year, but this will give plenty of time to plan before next Halloween! Cheers!


(Image credits: Walyou.com, Pinterest, zombiepumpkins.com, Escape Adulthood, Doux Reviews, Comediva, Danny DoDat, Yell! Magazine, The Rhinestone Housewife)

Thursday, June 30, 2016

The Nice Guys: Shane Black's comeback after the lukewarm feedback on "Iron Man 3"

Today, I look at the new detective comedy from Shane Black, writer of Lethal Weapon and co-writer of The Monster Squad and director of Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang, Iron Man 3 and the upcoming Predator and Doc Savage movies. (Obviously, this guy has had quite the resume during his 30 year career.)

The Nice Guys:
After a girl named Amelia goes missing and a death occurs, bumbling, alcoholic private investigator Holland March is put on the case. Eventually, he crosses paths with Jackson Healy, an ex-something-or-other who now has made a business for himself as a hired muscle of sorts. The two eventually decide to team up when both are targeted by some hitmen and mob enforcers, leading them to believe that Amelia's disappearance and the nearby death are linked, and are tied to a much larger conspiracy.
    Shane Black goes back to his pseudo-noir roots with this pulpy action-comedy piece. From the opening reels, I was reminded of films like Chinatown and games like L.A. Noire, not just for the setting, but also because I knew going in there would be some sort of conspiracy (the trailers make that clear), and I could see the clues being dropped immediately. This is not to discredit the film at all, however, as Black throws in plenty of curveballs and twists that make just guessing how it all fits together impossible until all the pieces are revealed masterfully. I also loved how the conspiracy plot, once shown in its' full scope, is not as deadly serious as one might expect and fits the film's crazy, fun universe.
    Black's dialogue has always be whip-smart and funny, but this is arguably his best work in comedy. My God, I didn't even realize how much I loved the film or the dialogue until me and my brother who I saw it with started quoting it constantly. It's really a brilliant and highly-quotable film.
    Russell Crowe and Ryan Gosling have terrific chemistry on screen and show their range here. Crowe, while used to roles as the badass fighter character or the stoic hero, has a lot more fun with the role here, and is a lot more likable and even sometimes giddy than the trailers portray. Gosling trades in his usual role of the stone-faced, brutal anti-hero from films like Drive, The Place Beyond the Pines, and Only God Forgives for a goofy, flawed, weak-willed, lethargic private eye who needs his 13-year-old daughter to drive him from bar to bar. Speaking of which, the unofficial third part of the group is Angourie Rice as Holly. While her strange fixation on not killing got irritating at times, she ultimately is far more endearing and funny than any of the typical annoying kid sidekicks. She has great father-daughter chemistry with Gosling on screen, and even Crowe and her share some touching moments.
    Kim Basinger, Keith David, Beau Knapp, Matt Bomer, Margaret Qualley, Yaya DaCosta and Lois Smith fill out the rest of the principle cast, with memorable cameos by Murielle Telio, Ty Sympkins (a Shane Black alum), Jack Kilmer (the son of a Shane Black alum, Val Kilmer), and Hannibal Burress. All these players do fantastic jobs, but I can't really delve much into each part without spoilers.
    The action in this film, like in Lethal Weapon or other detective/buddy cop movies, is not the usual explosions and CG battles. It is more subdued, but no less fun or exciting. There aren't many true set-pieces until the final act, but the witty dialogue and slowly unraveling and increasingly crazy mystery was plenty to keep me engaged. This is a movie that feel longer than it is, in a good way. At only just shy of 2 hours, it was the shortest summer movie I've seen thus far, and it felt much more satisfying as a film than any others. It didn't feel like a bigger part of a franchise puzzle, and didn't feel cheap, and while there was room left for a sequel, it didn't pander, and that I respect more than anything I think. (The soundtrack, sets, and costumes were also fantastic, really giving an oversaturation that "this is the 70's!" that fit the comic book-y tone of the movie very well).
     The Nice Guys is an awesome ride, and is probably the best summer movie out right now, despite not really being typical summer movie fare. It's wild, hilarious, thrilling, and just a ton of fun, probably the most fun movie I've seen since last year's Mad Max: Fury Road, though the two are drastically different movies. 7.5/10 stars.

The Nice Guys poster.png                                            (Image: Wikipedia)

Monday, June 20, 2016

Captain America- Civil War: A mostly redeeming new installment in the increasingly stale Marvel Cinematic Universe

Again, a really late review, but I only recently saw this film in theaters.

Captain America, Civil War:
After another somewhat destructive attempt at containing a violent situation, the Avengers are contacted by General Thaddeus "Thunderbolt" Ross (the headstrong, stubborn military official who's usually off hunting the Hulk), representing the UN, who criticize the Avengers' often reckless nature, despite the amount of people they save. Ross instructs them to support a new set of bills that will put the Avengers under the jurisdiction of the UN, who will first discuss if a situation even needs their attention. Captain America doesn't want to be a part of this, for obvious reasons, and it leads to a split in the team: those in favor and those opposed. Iron Man leads those in favor, as he is in complete agreement with the UN (for reasons which are very apparently selfish). Meanwhile, a string of recent terror attacks are blamed on Bucky Barnes/The Winter Soldier, who is still on the run after escaping the clutched of HYDRA at the conclusion of the previous film. Captain America violates his commitment to his team to chase after and save his old friend from persecution by the government, all while new players come into the fray and a mysterious new villain pulls the strings of the entire situation.
    I wasn't even particularly excited for this film, but saw it more out of obligation, and was pleasantly surprised by how entertained I was with it. Is it a flawless film? Hell no. In fact, the entire basis for the conflict in the movie is contrived and clearly one-sided (Captain America's side is clearly in the right throughout the entire movie, and the government in this film is one of the most misguided and idiotic and stubborn in all fiction). It's not even the best Captain America movie (it's not as bland as the first, but is nowhere near as focused as the second). It was, regardless, a fun blockbuster movie, and really should just be considered an Avengers 2.5, as the only Avengers absent from the film are Hulk and Thor. The Russo Brothers are actually able to juggle the overstuffed roster of heroes, villains and supporting characters fairly well, but the character relationships meaning anything to you really rely on you seeing all the previous Marvel films first (great monetary strategy there, Disney/Marvel).
    One of my most dreaded aspects of this film was Spider-Man, as I felt having him introduced in someone else's film was no way for such a major character to get treated, and I felt it was just too much. While I still hold on both of those accounts, he wasn't in the film all that much, and I actually liked Tom Holland's portrayal a lot. Time will tell if he bests Tobey Maguire, but he was nowhere near as annoying or unlikable as Andrew Garfield's portrayal, and felt like an awkward, funny teenager. The suit itself is design-wise excellent, but the CG looked way too synthetic and they'll need to work on that in future installments.
    Daniel Bruhl as the main villain Helmut Zemo was actually a breath of fresh air for an MCU antagonist. He was genuinely compelling (as much as a summer blockbuster villain can be, anyway) and didn't rely too heavily on crazy costumes or a gimmick to make him stand out. However, once his motivation is revealed as an overdone and almost comical cliche, all the mystery and menace surrounding his character washes away and he falls flat. Even though a problem with many Marvel villains is they only show up for one installment and don't do much interesting, I hope he can be involved in future installments so he can do something interesting and redeem the damage done to his character.
    Frank Grillo briefly returns as Brock Rumlow/Crossbones, the renegade STRIKE leader from the previous film. While I was sad his role was cut short, I also felt he was used appropriately, the same way Batroc the Leaper was used in The Winter Soldier: have a more minor villain show up at the beginning to reintroduce the heroes using an exciting action sequence and provide a match for Captain America in a cool fight.
     New introductions to the series include Martin Freeman in a very minor role, and Chadwick Boseman, who does a fine job as T'Challa/Black Panther, prince of Wakanda and who is on a revenge mission against the Winter Soldier, bringing him to butt heads with Captain America. While is screen time is limited compared to other heroes, he is a welcome addition to the ensemble.
    There were many narrative problems with the movie, from some cliched and rushed scenes (the death of a character's father was cliche and totally handled poorly), and, again, as many have pointed out, the government and Iron Man in this film are very unsympathetic and their motivation is garbage. "The Avengers cause collateral damage wherever they go, resulting in thousands of deaths." Yeah, versus billions of deaths if they did nothing, which Ross almost acknowledges when he's not smugly and unflinchingly showing death footage of their various battles to guilt them into agreeing with him. And the UN bill wouldn't even stop the casualties, just acknowledge when the casualties were "worth it" for the greater good. And the government was all for nuking NYC in The Avengers, which would've resulted in far more civilian deaths had Iron Man not stepped in.
     As far as I understand, the Civil War arc in the comics was less a UN board squabbling over whether to let the Avengers fight and more a registration act like in X-Men, where each hero would have to publically register themselves (still a really stupid idea). But the motivation felt more realistic because the entire controversy in-story was set off when heroes neglected to contain a villain who can explode on command, resulting in hundreds of children dying, as they were fighting in a playground. Here, it's because an accident near the beginning leads to a few dozen deaths at a government office complex in Lagos, in addition to the other times the Avengers' actions led to unintentional carnage. That just feels a little forced to me, as the benefits of the team so clearly outweigh the flaws.
    The relationship between Bucky and Captain America feels a bit forced at times, but ultimately gets more fleshed out in this movie, and the final three-way battle between them and Iron Man is a lot more emotional and investing than expected, even though, crushingly, it (and the other events in the film) have little impact on the team in the end.
     Captain America: Civil War has plenty wrong with it, and often has too much going on (I didn't even mention the inappropriately placed and a bit creepy romantic interest shoved in this film- who is the niece of Captain America's original love interest) but it should just be taken at face value. It's better than the last two Marvel films for sure, and balances out the fun, campy humor with some more serious and dark moments, creating a good bridge of tones I felt should be kept for future Marvel films. 7/10 stars.

Two great reviews (the former more a discussion) about the film, with Spoiler Segments, that cover a lot of what I left out of this review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJvUTFVqwJQ (RedLetterMedia)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q6X8oHh7wA (Your MovieSucks)


Official poster shows the Avengers team factions which led by Iron Man and Captain America, confronting each other by looking each other, with the film's slogan above them, and the film's title, credits, and release date below them.                          (Image: Wikipedia)

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Hardcore Henry: Ever seen a videogame you felt should've just been a movie? How about a movie that should've just been a videogame?

I followed news of this film from the original music video that inspired it ("Bad Motherfucker" by Biting Elbows for those that don't know, as well as its precursor "The Stampede"), to its sneak previews and premieres at film festivals, all the way to its anticipated release internationally this past April. So, did it live up to the hype?

Hardcore Henry:
You, the audience, awake in a POV state. Your scientist wife, Estelle, addresses you as Henry, and says there was an accident that has led Henry to becoming a cyborg. Suddenly, mercenaries burst in, slaughtering the staff and kidnapping Estelle. Henry barely escapes the facility, and must travel the countryside without memories, chasing his wife with your mysterious new associate Jimmy (who may or may not be trustworthy), pursued by the mercenaries, led by the telepathic and gleefully theatrical villain Akan. Learning the extent of his newfound powers, Henry shoots, stabs, and bludgeons his way across Russia, becoming a hardened killer and super solider on his quest for revenge.
    I was very excited for this film, having heard it compared tonally to films like Mad Max: Fury Road and Crank for its emphasis on style over substance, and mindless and bloody fun over plot or character. Not that I don't love films with deep, fleshed-out characters and intricate plotting, but I also enjoy a well-made piece of escapism as well. Now, the actual film was disappointing on a few fronts, and I'll cover those right away. I felt the use of GoPros for the limited budget and goal of entirely being in first-person was impressive and practical, but the quality of the cameras does not exactly translate to the big screen all that well, as many shots were slightly fuzzy-looking. The special effects for many shoot out sequences were fine, but the CGI blood sprays and explosions often looked like a YouTube video, which is not to disrespect CG animators on YouTube, but for a feature film, it's a little more noticeable.
    Also: the lack of plot and incredibly rigid structure of this film made it often exhausting. While that sounds contradictory, I mean there was no real characters (just archetypes) to get into, so the action took center stage, But after a while, the rinse-and-repeat formula (crazy action scene, then calm break of about two minutes, then next action scene) left me feeling drained, and that this would function better as a web series or video game, something where you can take breaks at your leisure or that felt more interactive. There was also a sound issue in the final battle (the song was quieter than the sound effects), and the way the film ended felt abrupt and kind of awkward and amateur but those are incredibly minor.
    Other than those minor issues, I felt the film delivered on its promise of weird, crazy, chaotic, fun, violent action and the set-pieces were incredibly well-constructed for a first time feature director, and the lack of characters and over-the-top acting often added to the charm of this wild movie. There were non-action sequences that were incredibly Neveldine and Taylor-esque (a song and dance number near the climax of the film added some much-needed comic relief as well as tied together a mysterious plot line). The final battle was jaw-dropping, as I was not expecting the film to pack the amount of gore it did, especially not in its' final moments. It was exhilarating and entertaining as hell. Also: the opening credits sequence was very Bond, while also foreshadowing the possibly Evil Dead inspired splatstick style of humor.
    Danila Kozlovsky was entertaining as the tongue-in-cheek and ridiculous villain Akan, Haley Bennett played a decent damsel in distress (though the reveal with her character is very predictable towards the climax), and Tim Roth has a nice cameo. But the only character i can truly say is impactful in any significant way is Sharlto Copley as Jimmy. Once again, Copley shows his incredible range as an actor: he spend the movie doing silly accents and wearing goofy outfits, but is also some good comic relief and ultimately a bit of a tragic character who I actually grew to care about on some level (he is supposed to be the audience's guide/companion of sorts).
    Do not go into Hardcore Henry expecting a traditional moviegoing experience. If you like any sort of linear narrative or strong central characters, then I suggest looking elsewhere. But if you love so brainless, energetic, if a bit gruesome action and humor, then I would highly recommend it (if you've seen the music videos the film is based on, or listened to the director's band Biting Elbows' punk-style pop rock, you'll know pretty much what to expect). It is a lower budget indie film, so it may not have the special effects many Western audiences are used to expecting from action films, but the impressive choreography and insane sequences will provide ample distraction. Bravo to Ilya Naishuller on a terrific first outing, and I'd like to see him pursue more films in the future. 7/10 stars.

Hardcore (2015 film).jpg                                                           (Image: Wikipedia)

Batman v. Superman- Dawn of Justice: Bloated and boring, a review I don't want to write as much as I didn't want to see this movie but felt obligated to

I'm just trying to get this one over with.

Batman v. Superman, Dawn of Justice:
After the destruction of Metropolis at the conclusion of Man of Steel, the public is debating whether or not having Kal-El/Superman around is a good thing. Continuing his relationship with Lois Lane and job at the newspaper as Clark Kent, he is faced with a new challenger. The aging but still very active and violent vigilante Batman is operating in the neighboring city of Gotham. Batman, after first hand witnessing the fallout of Metropolis' demise, is determined to stop the overpowered alien visitor from causing any more havoc, even if it means having to take him down personally. All the while skeevy young tycoon Lex Luthor (Junior) is pulling the strings to get Superman out of the picture so he can rule Metropolis. Why is all this happening? Because DC needs a quick movie to catch up with Marvel.
    Everything about this film feels forced and purely corporate driven. It is far too early to cram this many heroes into one film as not each hero has been set up yet. Not necessarily saying everyone needs an origin movie, but at least a means of setting them up prior to the battle royale film. It took Marvel almost ten years since the original Iron Man to get to their Civil War film because it takes time to build these character relationships (however cliche) to get the audience to care about the conflict. This film barely can even find a reason for the two heroes to dislike each other, simply they have different approaches to dealing with completely different problems (i.e. Superman fights cosmic threats, Batman deals with street thugs and psychopaths).
    The problem was also adapting several different stories: they adapt The Dark Knight Returns and Superman: Doomsday simultaneously, while also doing a Justice League setup and Batman vs. Superman story. It is a jumbled mess that completely is tonally off. It is very clear that this film had extensive cuts made (solidified by the upcoming "Ultimate" R-rated cut) to keep it to the still draining 2 and a half hour runtime.
    Ben Affleck actually delivered fairly well as Batman, being dark and imposing, almost like a horror character, and really selling the idea that this is a vengeful person who puts the fear into criminals and cops alike. However, his "no killing" rule that has been so integral to his mythos for so long has been scrapped in favor of the militarized, borderline self-parodying Batman of the Frank Miller graphic novels that does not seem to wince at bloodshed or torture to achieve his goals of clean streets. Also, his motivation to hate Superman is staggeringly weak. For such a worldly and intelligent character as Batman is supposed to be, he sure jumps to xenophobia and paranoia quickly.
    The rest of the cast (at least the returners from Man of Steel) do fine but ultimately are just so droll and lifeless that they cease to be investing. Zack Snyder's casting now matches his visual palate: he's able to do such remarkable things with visuals, but always tends to suck out the color and energy in his films, surprisingly, given the comic medium's great strengths have always been a reliance strong visuals and striking colors.
    Callan Mulvey appears as KGBeast (only called by his name in this film), Scoot McNairy and Holly Hunter have new supporting roles, and Jeremy Irons is Alfred and all do okay, as none are given enough screentime to really develop (or in Mulvey's case, he's a one-dimensional henchman character who was only included to give comic fans the hope that more obscure villains will be used in the future).
     On a related note, Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor was not all that bad. Sure, he had some off moments (probably due to those extensive cuts I mentioned), and many complained he's too chaotic for a Lex Luthor, but ultimately I thought the idea of turning him into a jittery, eccentric Silicon Valley-esque CEO was a fresh take, even though his dialogue was often hammy and over dramatic.
    The film's plot is drawn out and dull, and certain sequences stand out (namely the introduction of Batman, which was tense and surprisingly eerie), but a lot (the opening slow-mo sequence is just the same Batman origin scene we've seen a million times, with some added laughable religious symbolism) didn't amount to much and the real action set-pieces don't begin until the climax, at which point the movie shifts from overly brooding and grim (seriously, the charming Superman doesn't so much as crack a reassuring smile when he's saving people from danger) to a campy, silly CGI mess. Even the actual Batman vs. Superman fight felt overlong and didn't fit in this universe at all (Snyder's Kal-El went from disintegrating skyscrapers with minimal effort in the previous film to barely being able to dent Batman's armor here), and ultimately was just boring to watch because there was no investment in the characters.
    The overall choices made in the film were dismal (Jimmy Olsen, a beloved comics character, is not even named on screen and dies 30 seconds after he's introduced as Lois' CIA contact on a trip to a warzone; the odd release date in March; the extensive cuts and rush to get this film to theaters; the cramming of far too many characters and ideas into what should be just a Batman vs Superman piece; having Batman and Superman fight in only their second film together; not just making a Man of Steel sequel, etc.) If this is really DC's method of making films, then I think it's time for them to quit trying to catch up with Marvel (they're a near-decade behind them), and just stick to doing what they've always done best: standalone films. Or maybe, just maybe, slow their roll on this whole "cinematic universe" idea. Because judging by this film's reception, people aren't having it, and DC will tank if they keep this up. Zack Snyder should go back to adapting novels and remaking things because when he has to build a fresh script from the ground up, it never ends well, and his visuals are his strong point, not his storytelling abilities. 4/10 stars.

The two titular heroes, Batman and Superman, are confronting each other, with the film's logo behind them, and the film's title, credits, release date and billing below.                                                             (Image: Wikipedia)

Friday, March 18, 2016

The Witch: A terrific examination of Puritan culture, repressed desires, and paranoia, all in a tightly paced and impressively executed period horror package

Today, I look at the incredible debut project from Robert Eggers.

The Witch:
An isolated Puritan family on a farm in the uncharted territories of New England are faced with horrific tragedy when their newborn Sam goes mysteriously missing. Suspecting a witch is in their midst, the family must fend off this insidious and seemingly supernatural force as it tears their family apart, fueled by their restrictive religious beliefs and superstitious fears.
    Robert Eggers has constructed here a brilliant horror film, and a tautly thrilling period drama about an unraveling family facing both the hardships of their isolated, conservative lifestyle and poor harvest as well as more primal fears such as the fear of the unknown. The inspiration from Puritan folklore is undeniable, namely given away by the subtitle A New England Folktale, but also the setting and themes. The dark, foreboding wood which threatens to envelop the relatively peaceful and serene green farmland is a staple of Grimms' Fairy Tales like Red Riding Hood and Hansel and Gretel, not to mention the brief glimpses we get of the titular monster's cottage in the deep woods and her various guises she takes (I won't give one away but let's say it's fairly reminiscent of a popular female fairy tale character) seem to be images we've all seen re-imagined in countless interpretations of classic stories.
    The nuance and subtlety of characters and their motivations and repressed desires is something I was surprised the film tackled as well as it did. It never feels as though it is shoving anything in your face, but rather has slight implications, and keeps you in the dark. In fact, it can never be sure up until the climax that what we are seeing is just the product of cabin fever mixed with religious indoctrination-related fears of the Devil, or is truly the Prince of Darkness infesting the familial cottage.
   The musical score by Cube composer Mark Korven is pitch-perfect, reminiscent of the more experimental soundtracks of the 70's horror films while also capturing the tone of the film well: slow-building, uncomfortable, and searing to experience. The compositions made each scene elevated in tension and ominousness, making me hope that the upsetting and gruesome acts on screen would cease and the horrible, disjointed chants and rhythms of the music would stop infesting my eardrums, and I cannot give a bigger compliment to the sound design than that.
    Eggers' attention to period accurate sets, costumes, and dialogue will off-put the teen audience members who will have unmistakably flocked to this film expected the dull and tired jump-scares of Blumhouse films, only to discover the scenes in this film sometimes read like that classic play they hate reading in English class. The shame in the greatness of this film is the majority of its' audience (the aforementioned teens and college-aged slasher and jump scare buffs)  will not appreciate the period dialogue or subtle psychological horror or dramatic tension and will mistake the film for boring, pretentious, or just plain weird and pointless.
   The acting was incredible from the central players, who are the only characters we really get to know in the movie. Anya Taylor-Joy was unexpectedly inspired as Thomasin, the eldest daughter and the closest thing the film gets to a main heroine. She was vulnerable and stressed with the immense pressure on her to help in the family affairs, but also felt like a real teenage girl living in that period: repressed, confused, tired of living in fear of God, etc. Her interactions with her siblings, including her brother Caleb (played by an also terrific Harvey Scrimshaw, who portrays the struggles of an adolescent boy growing up in such a restrictive and isolated family) felt so real and vivid. Ralph Ineson and Kate Dickie, both recognizable faces and veterans of character acting, especially in fantasy and period pieces, are almost Oscar-worthy as the parents. Ineson's father is gruff and righteous, but unlike most Puritan patriarch characters, he is too vulnerable and feels human and tormented, and you do get a sense that he is devoted to his family, even in his darker moments. Dickie's mother is utterly passionate in her devotion to both God and her children. Her declining sanity as her family's existence goes to hell is tragic and yet totally understandable given the circumstances and Dickie is experienced in portraying slightly unhinged matriarchs (just see her supporting role on Game of Thrones for further proof of that). The family felt real and incredibly sympathetic, making early scenes with them hard to stomach. I wanted this film to just be some period drama piece so nothing truly awful would befall them, but I also knew this was a horror film, so there was nothing to do but just watch the family slowly devolve into treachery and madness. If I ever do a more in-depth look at this film (which I intend to some day), I will more fully develop my thoughts on each character's specific flaws and desires and how they are exploited in throughout the film by the supernatural forces around them.
    The scenes with the witch (or is it a witch?) were handled remarkably. They were brief and disturbing, and offered only glimpses of the twisted world of this woman. It also makes one realize that it's no wonder why Puritans were so paranoid about witches in real life: if I though these women were real I'd be terrified, too. The portrayal of black magic in this film is raw and unflinching, but also vague enough to provide a sense of mystery about the subject to remain frightening and avoid bad taste.
    I cannot help but compare this film with Rob Zombie's The Lords of Salem. Both are frightening in their own respects and both center around witchcraft, but they are completely contrasting in styles (The Witch is a slow-burning period piece with minimal gore and a downplayed witch; The Lords of Salem is a throwback to the acid trip-esque exploitation films of the 70's and is very in-your-face with its' presentations of witchcraft and some truly demented and bad taste imagery). I like both films (though I like this recent one a bit more), and I feel both are throwbacks to true horror. No jump scares or silly slasher kills, just pure terror and human misery. And it is because of this that these are classics in any other period but now. Due to the way the horror market is now, it is essentially just a teen playground where it's all safe scares that have CG ghosts who go "BOO!" and are essentially a beginner's level of horror film. This means for these witch films to be a financial success, they have to be marketed to the teen horror audience. However, the general teen audience is also not mature nor educated enough to really comprehend the subjects tackled in these films and therefore will walk out hating the film and probably feeling cheated or revolted or both. If you are a person reading this who just wants a fun night out at the movies, a funhouse-style scare show where you can laugh it all off at the end, steer away from these films. But, if you are someone looking for some thought-provoking art that spurs real conversations on culture and religion while also packing in expertly crafted tension and nightmare-inducing imagery and sound design, then I cannot recommend these enough.
    While everyone's raving about Deadpool, I'm going to spread the word about The Witch. It's the first movie in a while that I've actually loved the more I've thought of it and I believe it is one of the best horror films in years. Hell, it's just a really good movie all-around. The acting, period detail, music and sound, assaulting imagery, and roots in classic folklore all add up to something that I think is truly Academy Award-worthy, at least nomination considerations. But, to my everlasting frustration, horror just isn't "Academy material" it seems looking at the recent years of the Oscars. Robert Eggers has proven himself a creative visionary to be looked out for in the near future, Anya Taylor-Joy and the other child actors have cemented names for themselves and hopefully get more work (and take it away from the dreadful child actors that get most of the work), and Ineson and Dickie have again proven themselves to be criminally underrated performers and strong leads. Just go see it. I don't care if you are the type of person I mentioned above who would probably not like it. Do yourself a favor, go in with an open mind and moderate expectations and you will probably be as blown away as I was by such a powerhouse debut for a director. 8/10 stars.

The Witch poster.png                                                   (Image: Wikipedia)

Sunday, January 24, 2016

The Hateful Eight: The 8th film from Quentin Tarantino

Today, I look at the 70mm western exploitation film from Quentin Tarantino.

The Hateful Eight:
Some ten years after the American Civil War, eight strangers are stranded in an intense blizzard at Minnie's Haberdashery, a small and cozy little cottage inn in the middle of nowhere. One of these men, John "The Hangman" Ruth, a notorious bounty hunter who always brings in his prisoners to hang as opposed to just killing them on sight, is transported vile murderess Daisy Domergue to hang in the town of Red Rock. However, he and his newfound friend Major Marquis Warren begin to suspect one of the tenants in this small cottage is not who they say they are, and may be planning to break Domergue free and kill the rest of them.
    Tarantino returns to the Western genre with a more contained story than in Django Unchained but with a runtime just as long. The limited locations and smaller cast make this feel more like a play (Tarantino even proposed adapting it into one), and sometimes this does make it feel longer than it is.
    The cast, featuring Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Walton Goggins, Demián Bichir, Tim Roth, Michael Madsen, Bruce Dern, James Parks, Dana Gourrier, Zoe Bell, Lee Horsley, and Gene Jones (most of whom are Tarantino regulars), are fantastic, infusing humor, horror, and wit into every scene. There is one final, surprise cast member whose name appears in the opening credits, whose cameo seems reminiscent of Jonah Hill's in Django in just how unexpected it is. All of the characters are fairly hateable (duh), even by Tarantino's standards of sordid characters, but towards the end you start to root for two in particular who have had the most arc out of anyone and the film does an excellent job of shifting your empathy between characters.
   The score by Ennio Morricone is phenomenal, evoking Morriconne's own earlier work, and all this at Morriconne's ripe age of 87. This score also features unused tracks from his score for John Carpenter's The Thing (also starring Kurt Russell and featuring characters stuck in a blizzard), which fit surprisingly well for this film. There were a number of shots and scenarios that seemed similar to The Thing, which, knowing Tarantino, was most probably intentional.
    While this film still falls back on Tarantino's tropes and doesn't really see him mature or progress as a storyteller (something I was kind of hoping for), I cannot deny it is immensely entertaining and although the violence is more few-and-far-between here than in his other films, the final showdown is spectacularly violent, although a little disappointing considering how good the first two acts were. The intermission was a nice touch, though my theater didn't actually pause for the 15 minutes intermission, but just kept going, making the narrator (Tarantino himself) explaining what happened in "the 15 minutes since we left our characters" at that point during the film potentially very confusing to other audience members who didn't hear there was supposed to be an intermission.
   Tarantino still delivers his trademark long, sharply witted dialogue, now mostly free of pop culture references, so he's matured in that way I suppose. The only problem is it seems that he is getting a little bit self-indulgent, and letting his dialogue go on a bit too long to the point where I could point out what fat could be trimmed to make the film more enjoyable. He also takes such a long time setting up each character that the murder mystery doesn't even begin until the third act, and instead of becoming a complex game of cat-and-mouse with the killer, ti quickly devolves into the type of bloodbath that Tarantino relishes so much.
  A character is shot in the groin in the film's final act, something that made me realize that Tarantino seems to have almost as much of a fetish for gratuitous groin shots as he does for feet. Seriously, he does it in most of his movies, it's almost a strange motif.
    The Hateful Eight isn't as classic nor as entertaining as Tarantino's earlier works, nor even Django, but is still an immensely enjoyable spaghetti western throwback with fun moments, splattery, gore-soaked action scenes, a diverse soundtrack and score, and some terrific dialogue. Though the lack of nominations in comparison to his last film should clue you in to how this film stacks up to it. 8/10 stars (currently, may decrease to a 7 or even a 6 if I watch it again).


The Hateful Eight.jpg                                  (Image: Wikipedia)

The Revenant: A visual powerhouse, but does it deserve the hype?

Today, I look at the latest film from modern filmmaker master Alejandro González Iñárritu.

The Revenant:
Fur trapper Hugh Glass is on a journey with a large party of scouts and trappers with his half-Indian son Hawk. After some unforeseen strokes of bad luck, Hugh finds himself left for dead in the harsh winter. Struggling to survive with vengeance as his only motivator, Glass braves the unrelenting wrath of mother nature. (DO NOT watch any trailers for the film, just take my word for it, they spoil a number of key reveals that I feel negatively effected my viewing experience a bit.)
   After being in development for 14 years, with numerous notable stars and one director (Park Chan-woo) leaving the project over the years, it's a wonder this film turned out as beautifully as it did. While Chan-woo is of course an incredibly gifted director with a keen eye for visuals, I don't even think he would have pulled off what Iñárritu and cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki were able to with this film. The long, uninterrupted, flowing movements of the camera throughout incredibly complicated action scenes in uncompromising and difficult filming locations astounds me and it is this monumental task that was accomplished that really pushes this film out of the realm of just general Oscar bait. Iñárritu is one of the most compelling and talented directors working today and I always look forward to his projects. Just one year after his Best Picture win for Birdman, it looks like he'll be taken home the gold statue again because to pull off this absolutely daunting film in under a year is breathtaking.
    Leonardo DiCaprio has always flirted with the idea of method acting but never really gone in full the way Christian Bale does, or Heath Ledger and Robert De Niro did. This is about as close as he's ever come to going complete method acting and it pays off. Despite this role feeling a very obvious plea to the Academy for Leo's ever-elusive Oscar win, his physical commitment to it and the things he reportedly did to prepare for his character are shocking and what most people would consider overkill but I feel without them, this film wouldn't be as impressive.
   Tom Hardy is excellent as the film's antagonist character, and the closest the film gets to a truly through-and-through despicable character. His physical appearance and savage mannerism were executed potently by Hardy and the make-up effects team, turning him and Leo from the handsomest men in Hollywood to disgusting, grungey scavengers.
   Will Poulter, Domhnall Gleeson, Forrest Goodluck, Paul Anderson, Brendan Fletcher, Kristoffer Joner, Brad Carter, Melaw Nakehk'o, Luka Haas, and Duane Howard fill out the rest of the principal cast, and all do an excellent job, except Gleeson. While he was serviceable, he didn't surprise me as much as the rest of the cast and felt like a bit of a weak link.
    While there are some glaring historical inaccuracies, which I won't spoil here for the sake of maintaining surprise for when you see the film, I just recommend to only take the film's story with a grain of salt and read up on it yourself. I also felt some of the political statements on Native Americans, both in the film and in the press surrounding it, were on-the-nose, unoriginal, and overdone. In the opening sequence, it seemed like they were taking an objective stance, portraying both sides as flawed and bit cruel, but then the rest of the film is spent talking about how great Native Americans were and trying to push the stereotype that Native Americans were peace-loving, in touch with the earth, and completely docile until settlers arrived.
    Many of stated the violence in this film is gut-wrenching and hard-to-watch, and although it is, and unlike anything Iñárritu has one before, I felt this hype was unwarranted. I sat there thinking "Sure, this is awful, but I've seen worse. Maybe if I didn't go into this with such expectations I'd be more shocked." Thanks again, social media, for once again overhyping something to no end with your sensationalism!
    Other than those two things, which are more minor complaints than major distractions, I felt this was an absolute dynamo that probably blows every other Oscar nominee out of the water (haven't seen them all yet, so who knows). Iñárritu has yet again delivered a brutal, unflinching film that tests the viewer, even if it does get a little pretentious at times. 8/10 stars.


The Revenant 2015 film poster.jpg                         (Image: Wikipedia)